Thursday, February 9, 2012

Report: Nearly 2M Foreclosures In First Half Of 2010
by Don Jergler | Realty Bites | 07.15.10 | 
| Text Size:
+

Repos hit another record in Q2. On a high note, June marks third straight monthly decrease in overall foreclosure filings.
 
3:40pm | Now that BP’s infamous well has been capped, another damaging leak that’s hurting the entire nation, including Long Beach, needs a little attention.

RealtyTrac today released its Midyear 2010 U.S. Foreclosure Market Report, which shows a total of 1.9 million foreclosure filings were reported in the first six months of 2010, an 8% increase from the first six months of 2009. The report also shows that one in 78 households received
ADVERTISEMENT
at least one foreclosure filing in the first half of the year.

"The roller coaster pattern of foreclosure activity over the past 12 months demonstrates that while the foreclosure problem is being managed on the surface, a massive number of distressed properties and underwater loans continues to sit just below the surface, threatening the fragile stability of the housing market," a RealtyTrac executive warned in the report.

The good news is that the nearly 2 million foreclosure-figure is actually a 5% drop from the previous six months—if one wants to really look hard to find some good news there.
 
For the month of June foreclosure filings were reported on 313,841 properties, which, according to the RealtyTrac report, is a decrease of nearly 3% from the previous month and a decrease of nearly 7% from June 2009. June was the 16th straight month where the total number of properties with foreclosure filings exceeded 300,000.
 
Here’s some more good(ish) news in the report: foreclosure filings were reported on 895,521 properties in the second quarter, down nearly 4% from the previous quarter. Default and auction notices were down on a month-over-month and year-over-year basis in the first quarter, although bank repossessions increased 5% from the previous quarter and rose 38% from the second quarter of 2009 to 269,962 foreclosures. That’s a new quarterly high.
 
"The second quarter was a tale of two trends," James J. Saccacio, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac, said in a statement. "The pace of properties entering foreclosure slowed as lenders pre-empted or delayed foreclosure proceedings on delinquent properties with more aggressive short sale and loan modification initiatives. Meanwhile the pace of properties completing the foreclosure process through bank repossession quickened as lenders cleared out a backlog of distressed inventory delayed by foreclosure prevention efforts in 2009. The midyear numbers put us on pace to exceed 3 million properties with foreclosure filings by the end of the year, and more than 1 million bank repossessions."
 
Nevada posted the nation’s highest foreclosure rate during the six-month period with nearly one in 17 of all housing units there receiving at least one foreclosure filing in the first half of 2010, despite decreasing foreclosure activity there. Arizona had the nation’s second highest foreclosure rate with one in 30 housing units receiving a foreclosure filing in the first half of 2010. Florida was third with one in 32 units receiving a foreclosure filing.
 
California, Florida, Arizona posted the highest foreclosure totals. Nearly 350,000 California properties received a foreclosure filing in the first half of 2010. However, that was down 15% from the previous six months and down nearly 13% from the first six months of 2009.
 
Unlike the tragic oil spill, you don’t hear much—or not enough, in my opinion—about stemming the tide of foreclosures being unleashed, or about to be unleashed, by banks on the American public.

However, earlier this week, New York City comptroller John C. Liu and six large unions announced plans to begin a campaign to press the biggest banks to do more to prevent foreclosures in the New York area, according to an article in the New York Times. Liu and the groups plan to send a letter to a handful of the nation’s largest lenders criticizing them for dragging their feet on modifying mortgages that are underwater or delinquent. The letter will also ask the banks to immediately name a high-level official to handle appeals of borrowers who are denied mortgage loan modifications, according to the Times article.

In Utah, the National Home Retention Advocacy Program is asking state lawmakers to pass a law that basically forces banks to sit down for mediation with a homeowner before they foreclose.

But will any such efforts work?

My other question is this: What the heck are banks doing with that nearly $1 trillion in pretty much no strings attached dough the government gave them without hesitation to save our economy in the first place? Certainly not helping underwater homeowners, small businesses and those who need help. As a taxpayer, I’d like to start a call to ask for that money back. Who is with me?


Comments
Click Here to Join the Discussion on this Story

8 Comments so far.
About that trillion bucks
The banksters have been repaying the money, ever since they understood that holding it meant they couldn't continue their usual lucrative dishonesty. You didn't know?

CHARLIE
They're waiting for the market to break while slobbering over all that money Obama gave them to loan to first time buyers and small business owners, and then Obama's going to try to tax the BG's out of them - REMEMBER NOV. 2nd will be your turn to get our country back.:>)

Ryan ZumMallen, Editor
Hey CHARLIE, thanks for commenting. President Bush actually signed the bank bailout into law in October 2008. http://tinyurl.com/4rkw33

CHARLIE
Well, Ryan, I try my best to rattle a few cages - Personally, my druthers was Reagonomics.:>)

Dennis
Most of the TARP funds have been repaid, with interest--the Fed made a profit in 2009. The repaid money is not being used to pay down debt however as the Administration is working to recycle it as more "stimulus" money. @"trillion" much of the TARP money was forced upon banks so their balance sheets would match what the Fed wanted at the time, as soon as they were allowed to pay back the money they did so. @Don: Non-financial corporations are sitting on over $3.1 trillion in cash. The uncertainty over the costs for Obamacare, tax hikes coming on 1/1/2011, and tight credit created by the Fed has them hoarding cash instead of investing in capital equipment and any expansion. Many corps are issuing larger dividends this year to lay off some of that cash. Regarding the tight lending, this week Sr Auditor with the Fed admitted they are discouraging small and community banks from lending to small businesses to keep the small business loan risk off the balance sheets. Previously at the same meeting Bernanke chastized banks for not loaning to small businesses. But if they do the Fed auditors put them on their watch list, or if already on the watch ask one of the big banks to take them over. Thank goodness we have even more regulation coming down to create more uncertainty and less investment.

CHARLIE
Thank You, Dennis!

don
Dennis, some TARP funds have been repaid, but much of that money is still owed to us taxpayers. Also, all that money those corporations are sitting on, and all that money sitting around in commercial real estate, will be used to buy distressed assets for profit. Little of that money will be used to help homeowners, small businesses and others--as it was intended for.

Dennis
Don: 1st the purpose of TARP was not to help small businesses and homeowners but to keep banks liquid. Look at the name Toxic Assets, the purpose was for Treasury/Fed to purchase toxic assets off the balance sheets. Instead the Fed leveraged the funds as loans to banks so they could exert controls, like compensation. Through June 75% of the TARP funds were repaid, with interest/dividends: http://www.dailymarkets.com/stocks/2010/06/24/banks-pay-back-75-of-tarp/ Of course the use of TARP funds to bail out the UAW via GM have not been repaid, and probably never will be. The Fed's audit policy is to not let community banks and small banks lend to small businesses, further the SBA program is getting ground to a halt as well. The official position of the Administration and the Fed at this point is no small banks and limited assistance to small and medium size companies. Companies are hoarding cash due to uncertainty as to their costs in the coming year and concern over credit tightening again in the coming year. Their cash holdings will allow them to continue to meet payrolls and future tax and health care costs imposed under the legislation passed this year, and the Cap and Trade that may be coming. Do you think it would be in a company's best interest facing unknown fiscal and political issues to spend down their cash and not have any reserves for the uncertain future? If so then buy Long Beach or CA municipal bonds.

Realty Bites
Reality Bites brings the wide world of business into focus through the lens of real estate.

Don Jergler's 12-year journalism career spans four daily newspapers, one magazine and a website. Between 2002 and 2008 he covered real estate, redevelopment, general business, tourism and downtown for the Long Beach Press-Telegram. For the past year he was Editor of Real Estate Southern California and edited and wrote for the popular commercial real estate news source globest.com.

Don's Community

Long Beach Housing Development Company
Hearts Without Boundaries


About Us | Contact Us | Policies