To Remove A Freeway In Long Beach
- Details
- By Brian Ulaszewski Follow @BUlaszewski
- | Friday, 23 July 2010 04:18

Shoreline Drive in downtown Long Beach
8:15am | The Institute of Transportation and Development Policy, an international planning think tank, recently commissioned ten architects to create bold visions for the world’s cities, to imagine a planet no longer dominated by the automobile. This “Our Cities, Ourselves” initiative included Michael Sorkin’s design concept for lower Manhattan. Sorkin envisioned replacing the Franklin Delano Roosevelt Drive ring road (also known as the FDR Freeway) with open space, bike paths, and ecological restoration. (New York Mayor Bloomberg’s administration is not taking the concept seriously.) Meanwhile, one of three options under consideration by the New York State Department of Transportation for the Sheridan Freeway is “remapping” this 1¼-mile-length of underused asphalt blocking the Hunts Point neighborhood from the Bronx River—in other words, removing it altogether. This would not only get rid of an obstruction between this community and its waterfront; the land made available would be used for private development, new open space, and other public amenities.
This South Bronx neighborhood joins a growing number of communities working to remove counterproductive infrastructure. While thousands of miles of freeways are still being created around the world, select cities, in response to evolving priorities and transportation needs, are repurposing some of these transportation corridors for other uses. From Milwaukee, Wisconsin to Seoul, South Korea, amazing transformations are taking place as freeways are transformed into parks, schools, and development opportunities.
At first glance, it can sometimes be hard to know if a freeway is unnecessary. One of the most famous examples of this dilemma involved the removal of San Francisco’s Embarcadero Freeway after its partial collapse during the Loma Prieta Earthquake of 1989. This freeway was largely deemed indispensable before the quake; indeed, in 1985 residents voted against removing the freeway for fear of causing massive gridlock in the surrounding community. But when the freeway was closed after the quake, traffic shifted to the adjoining street network. While this initially caused gridlock, it gradually eased. It was then decided to permanently remove the freeway, creating value for adjacent neighborhoods with a multi-modal boulevard flanked by a range of street activities and open space.
The experience of San Francisco, alongside other successful examples of freeway removal in places like Portland and Toronto, have fueled efforts to pursue similar opportunities in cities like Seattle, New Orleans, and Washington, DC. In Southern California, the “Land of Freeways,” there are currently few examples of such vocal advocacy, but not for lack of potential opportunities. According to a 1958 master plan, Los Angeles was to have a dense grid of freeways expanding on the existing system, to include a Beverly Hills Freeway, extending the 91 Freeway into the South Bay, and converting Pacific Coast Highway into a freeway connecting coastal cities from Santa Monica to Orange County.
The fact that these additional freeways went unrealized (for good or ill) has rendered other portions of the system less necessary. For instance, as the I-710 Freeway travels over the Los Angeles River into downtown Long Beach, it becomes Shoreline Drive, a name alluding to a more scenic experience along the waterfront. Shoreline Drive weaves through downtown, leaving parking lots and other remnant spaces in its wake. Aside from its terminus at the intersection with Ocean Boulevard and Alamitos Avenue, there is never enough traffic to warrant either its width of over 120 feet, or the various off-ramps, on-ramps, and overpasses that currently restrict pedestrian access to the waterfront.
We thus are presented with an opportunity to reconfigure Shoreline Drive into a beautifully landscaped multi-purpose boulevard along the lines of San Francisco’s renewed Embarcadero. Shoreline Drive could become a marquee address like Pine Avenue and Ocean Boulevard, featuring buildings that contribute to its vibrancy—rather than buildings that turn their backs to it, as is now the case with complexes like the Pike and the California State University’s Chancellor Building . Transforming interchanges into vibrant intersections could spur needed economic development along the waterfront. A rejuvenated Shoreline Drive with active open spaces and engaging buildings would represent a more appropriate welcome for visitors, workers, and residents.
Other opportunities exist for freeway removal in Long Beach. The Terminal Island Freeway (I-103) spans 2½ miles from the Port of Long Beach to the Union Pacific Railroad facility on Willow Street. The primary purpose of the freeway has been to move freight from the port to rail yards to the north. It was originally intended to extend to Union Station, fifteen miles north, before the Alameda Transportation Corridor was built less than a mile west. Developing the 20-mile-long Alameda Corridor has thus made extending the Terminal Island Freeway unnecessary, and is beginning to make the existing length redundant. In addition, proposed creation of an expressway between Ocean Boulevard and Alameda Street would shift much of the remaining traffic from the Terminal Island Freeway. At the same time, the Union Pacific Railroad proposes modernizing their Intermodal Container Transfer Facility (ICTF) moving their primary entrance from Willow Street to Alameda Street.
The two infrastructure projects will make the northern half of the Terminal Island Freeway largely unnecessary. Foreseeing this redundancy, the state has already transferred ownership of this northern one-mile portion of the Terminal Island Freeway to Long Beach. Removing this segment of underused freeway altogether would yield nearly three dozen acres of park space along the western edge of the city, creating an open-space buffer between existing residential neighborhoods and school campuses, and the port complex and refineries to the west.
The time is right to open a serious conversation about both Shoreline Drive and the Terminal Island Freeway. The I-710 Freeway is currently being studied for possible expansion, including realigning the freeway (and thus Shoreline Drive) as it travels through Cesar Chavez Park toward downtown. The realignment of port-serving infrastructure has created the opportunity to replace the city-owned portion of the Terminal Island Freeway with a vibrant, inviting urban landscape. These projects are all undergoing environmental review, and their approval could be assisted by proposals to repurpose the space left by removing underused freeways. It is precisely through such creative transformations of our “built-out” environment that we can create a Long Beach with greater economic development, pedestrian life, and open space.
http://www.lbpost.com/brian/2244
As far as the Grand Prix is concerned, bring back the Formula 1 cars!
i'd also like to see some improvement to access to the east freeway of the 605/405. 7th street is a nightmare to traverse at almost any time of the day. i'd love to see some improvement to the traffic flow there.
Unfortunately, the Pike is clearly not living up to its potential or expectation. This becomes painfully clear when someone like myself (and most of my friends) rarely, if ever, thinks of shopping in Long Beach for major purchases such as clothes, automobiles and furniture.
Someday, we may be lucky enough for this dynamic to change and we return to thinking "buy Long Beach" once again. This dramatic "sea change" will clearly take a major commitment on behalf of a city council with a solid "vision" for the future of this city. It certainly won't happen on its own or by accident!
The simplest area for improvement would be the Arena parking lot (when is that ever full?) and the green across the street, but again, only if it plays up the fact that there's a marina and beach RIGHT THERE.
The most intriguing section to me is between I-710 and Ocean. What about realigning/sinking the roadway and creating a true riverfront park (tying into Chavez Park)?
While it does appear that as a roadway, Shoreline appears under utilized (except for the Grand Prix). Makes more sense to me to use the money for correction of the badly designed and limited access to the area on the other side of the bay, i.e., Queen Mary, Maya Hotel, Reef, etc. Now that would make sense!
Barbara
Second, the SF Giants did build their new stadium along the waterfront. In addition, many other projects followed.
Now, will this work in Long Beach? Probably not. When you reach the end of the 710 freeway, where is there to go? Most successful oceanfront cities were developed with components that were inviting to the public. In other words, there are reasons for people to visit. Downtown Long Beach offers no reason for the masses to consistently visit that area. That issue needs to be resolved before undertaking an expensive proporal such as reconfiguing Shoreline Dr.
No, I don't want a high-speed road through Belmont. I'm just saying.
Of course, if future Vice Mayor Lowenthal gets her way, we'd all be on a trolley singing Kum Ba Yah.
That reason is the likely sea-level rise from climate change - which now the US Senate has indicated they want to promote, not obstruct.
CA state agencies plus federal agencies are beginning a study, with results due within two years, that will give much more informed, accurate and reliable forecasts of sea-level rise, for dates as early as 2030.
Serious plans for ANY developments and investments in LB's lowlands and Lower East Side would do well to await and heed the study results.
Pay those police and fire men first!! City beautification third or forth. We have to keep a lid on crime. Otherwise, I am thinking about just selling out and moving to freakin Idaho.
Let's pull Ocean Blvd out too and all the houses back to PCH for some real greenspace while we're at it!
This smacks of another development as good as the Pike. What was the name of that sporting goods franchise that cost us a milliom - Bum wasn't it?
How about working on more jobs and cheaper business licenses, lower slip fees for boat owners (they aren't all rich like the city seems to think) and restaurant pricing more in line with the type of food and service provided as a way to bring business and people to this area.
The city wants and needs to increase its tax base through more development. This policy has failed so many times - how about the aquarium?
Let's not put our limited funds into more downtown development designed to benefit a few architects and developers that end up only producing a few minimum wage jobs.
Let's wait for a better idea or try to work with a system that really isn't broken - yet!
You KNOW how the city would propose to pay for this, don't you? Increase the parking fees and have meters running 24/7 - that's how. Because it's worked so well already in the downtown area.
If access to the beach is what you want, why not just clear out everything below Ocean Blvd. and convert it back to a beach? No need for Shoreline Drive at all, no need for the Convention Center, Shoreline Village, the Aquarium. Just make it a beach.
Oh....but be sure to build in some parking structures so you can charge outrageous rates.
Gotta love these looney Greenpeace libbers. Afraid of the free market, afraid of jobs, afraid to NOT spend money, and afraid of cars.
Hey I know, why don't we all just go back to riding horses?!?!
Why can't we all just get along? Would it be THAT hard for all of us to just join hands and sing Kumbayah?!?! It would be SOOOO nice.
Well I for one, won't be happy until the world is rid of these nasty automobiles. CURSE the person whom invented them!!!!!!!!!!!!!! =-{
Please make it stop. Somebody shut these loons up. I'm getting a headache!!!
Nice job. You worked all the liberal rhetoric arguing tactics in there, and tied them all together.
So let's see, NOW EVEN WANTING TO DRIVE A CAR OR USE A ROAD EQUATES TO RACISM????