People versus Parking
- Details
- By Brian Ulaszewski
- | Monday, 09 January 2012 03:43

9:30am | A few years ago my automobile was towed to the municipal yard for impound after I had received a series of street-sweeping-related parking tickets. From then on, except for rare occasions when I had to drive to a meeting, I left my car at the office, since I had been walking to work most of time, anyway.
While sitting at my desk one day I received a call from the parking management for the office building where I work. After confirming the license plate number, make, and model of my car they asked me, “You do know that you are not allowed to park your car overnight in the structure?” “Why not?” I inquired. “The garage is empty every night. How about I stop parking overnight when it starts impacting your capacity?” My office pays monthly rent to store our cars in the garage; I saw little difference in parking overnight versus during work hours, especially so when it was empty. After continuing the battle between logic and their rules, they said that a supervisor would call back. Though the supervisor never called, it became my entrance into the war on parking.
This campaign is not against parking itself, but the relentless zombie horde of inflexible parking regulations dictating one-size-fits-all solutions and the culture of convenience, where a parking stall must be in front of every desired destination. To this day the unstoppable combination of the two has wasted resources, erased built history, and caused the loss of vibrancy in residential neighborhoods and commercial districts. According to a 2007 Federal Department of Transportation study, there are over 250 million registered private automobiles in the United States, but studies by various academics and government agencies estimate that there are as many as 2 billion parking stalls in the United States.
A recent New York Times article estimated that up to a third of American cities are paved for parking lots. During a lecture about parking in downtown commercial districts, Ventura’s City Manager Rick Cole poignantly stated that, “With such a surplus of available parking, a car will never go homeless.” The struggle is for smarter parking guidelines and our collective willingness to walk a block or two from our car to our destination. Together these provide greater flexibility to create places for people, not cars.
The article goes onto describe a familiar history, as Pensacola, Florida, tore down its urban fabric of historic structures in the downtown to create convenient parking lots in an effort to compete with shopping malls emerging in the suburbs. Instead, the vast empty fields of parking sucked the remaining life from the downtown — just as it has in Long Beach. Today, one must walk past blocks of near empty parking lots and structures between the core of Downtown Long Beach and surrounding neighborhoods.
Following the lead of communities like Portland, San Diego, and Seattle, Long Beach seeks to recapture these asphalt deserts for people with the adoption of the Downtown Plan. Current zoning standards have resulted in large developments whose core design principle was most often based around parking provisions. Walking along Seaside Way past thousands of empty parking stalls in the Aqua Towers, Harbor View apartments, and Pike makes one wonder how much nicer the experience would have been if priorities were slightly different.
The new zoning documents revise parking standards to provide greater flexibility for infill development and adaptive reuse of existing structures, making smaller, context-sensitive projects much more feasible. Instead of seeing blocks of parking garages like those on First Street, new development would be required to line the sidewalk with positive uses like shops, lobbies, and residential stoops. Despite the limitations of any zoning document (as I wrote about here), there could be a significant rebalancing of priorities to create a more vibrant downtown.
Long Beach is also engaging an insurgent campaign against the vast amounts of public domain used for storing cars. Community organizations, individuals, and even the mischievous city staffer participate in the global, one-day event Park(ing) Day, as temporary parks were installed across the city in parking stalls. This past year saw a dozen mini-parks established across the city with book fares, outdoor dining, concerts, and public outreach occupying spaces once meant only for cars.
Some of these are becoming more permanent as Long Beach experiments with the parklet phenomenon, as three temporary sidewalk plazas are being built along Fourth Street in Retro Row and the East Village. Local favorite restaurants Berlin Cafe , Number Nine Noodles, and Lola’s Mexican Cuisine will construct wooden decks that expand their outdoor dining without impeding pedestrian traffic on these narrow sidewalks. While losing fewer than a half-dozen (total) of their most convenient parking stalls, the business-owners and local associations have deemed the benefit to their respective business and overall pedestrian experience well worth the trade.
Not all are zero-sum equations of parking versus people, as is evident from the new affordable-housing development Pine Crest in Central Long Beach. This partnership between the City of Long Beach and Jamboree Housing Company combines three multi-family properties to create a single community, rehabilitating the existing structures and improving the overall site. Removing existing driveways, converting an existing apartment back into a garage (a previously illegal unit conversion), and better use of land will net more parking for the neighborhood, while increasing available open space for new residents ten-fold.
The march towards balancing the priorities of parking and people will require flexibility from our regulation and culture. People are willing to walk a few blocks on Second Street in Belmont Shore from car to destination(s), while ever more of us are willing to ride our bikes or public transit. Despite the commercial district having far fewer parking stalls than required by zoning code, the Belmont Shore area is successful because of the experience. Instead of walking past parking lots, shoppers and diners stroll past shops and sidewalk dining filled with people.
Whether it’s through regulations like the Downtown Plan or insurgent action like Park(ing) Day and parklets, the tide can be turned so that we are parking smarter and creating more vibrant places.


Sponsors
Numerous suggestions have been offered to improve their utilization and relieve the parking strain of the beach communities. ALL SUGGESTIONS were shot down.
The city is more interested in reserving the beach parking lots for their special events department to periodically rent out to the movie companies. Meanwhile, the beach lots are an unused resource that require money to maintain.
TEAR DOWN THE BREAKWATER, and those problems will resolve themselves!
A case in point: In Naples, on 2nd Street, there is a Rite-Aid drug store. Next to it is a small strip mall parking lot serving the Rite Aid and some small businesses.
Nearby, on 2nd Street, are several small restaurants.
Street parking is limited here. So it is an obvious alternative to use this small lot. Rite Aid closes at 10 PM. The other stores close well before that --- usually at 6 PM.
The owner of the property has a contract with an unscruplous towing company that the LBPD has had many complaints about. It is reasonable to think that, on a Friday or Saturday night, parking is needed for the restaurants.
While the lot is "posted" (not well), there is no one using those slots for the stores at this time of the evening. Logically, it hurts no one but the nearby restaurants if cars cannot park there.
On weekends, there is often a fleet of tow trucks waiting outside the parking lot for 10 PM to come. Then ZIP! any car parked in the lot is towed. As a result, if you go to dinner at 8 PM and leave the restaurant at 10:10 PM, don't expect to find your car.
It costs over $325 to get your car back --- payable to the towing company. I don't know for a fact, but the aggressiveness of this company suggests that somebody else (the property owner?) is getting a cut of this.
This happened to us. We sued in Small Claims Court --- and won. It was, however, one royal pain the in backside to cope with these people.
The hypocrisy is that, you can park there and go to lunch at a nearby restaurant and nobody will bother you. This DOES affect the strip mall's business. God forbid that you should be there after 10 PM --- when there is no possiblity of hurting their business.
Sometimes it's self-park for $8 with NO VALIDATION (i.e. RIPOFF) and at certain times it's VALET ONLY for god knows what... this is just ridiculous and I just take my business to the Lakewood area restaurants where the parking is free.
This was a great read for me. Parking Downtown is no joke. Someone commented on the parking situation downtown near Mai Tai Bar and the Aquarium. Fees are high and it's a hassle...
Keep this series going... por favor.
And why is that? Because it is ALWAYS about you.
The Aquarium structure sits empty because people won't pay $8 in advance (no validation allowed) in order to go to Bubba Gump's, Mai Tai Bar, etc. V20 was smart to pull out when they did.
And don't even get me started on what the "bike lanes" on Broadway and on 3rd have done to decimate downtown businesses. What they've done is make it easier to go elsewhere - ANYWHERE else.
The fact of the matter is, downtown residents can't sustain all the businesses in downtown LB by themselves and neither can the out of towners who sporadically come in for a day or two to attend a convention. If you want bustling restaurants and decent shopping downtown after 5:00 pm, you're going to have to pull in people who live outside downtown and make downtown LB a destination.
DLBA and the city need to pull their collective heads out of their hind ends or downtown will remain a ghost town.
When I moved to an apartment just West of Cherry on 4th Street, street sweeping was at 6 AM. I was working a night shift back then, and would almost always get home after midnight. On street sweeping nights I'd often have to park a quarter to half a mile away, and walk through some extremely sketchy areas to get home.
So, in areas with very high density, street sweeping seemed intentionally scheduled to generate citations, and in affluent low density areas, the opposite.
This seems to indicate, yet again, that the City is not serving the needs of its residents. Ideally, the system should be designed to generate as few tickets as possible.
The reasoning for the early schedule on 4th Street is that it is zoned as commercial. The handful of business owners take precedence over the hundreds or thousands of residents.
If you think about city areas that are destinations NYC, SF, Boston, etc., they are not very car friendly. What makes a dense city attractive is the walkability and the "connectedness", not how easy it is to drive there.
The beautify of bike lanes, and the Passport, is the city is making it easier to not have to drive there. Unless you're on a race track or a country road, is driving anywhere really enjoyable? Was it really ever a nice drive to Downtown? It can be incredibly frustrating just driving the 3-4 miles from Bayshore to Shoreline on Ocean before you ever enter the official boundary of Downtown. Why not ride a bike or walk, enjoy the SoCal whether, and best of all not have to sit in a car waiting for a bunch of red lights? :)