1. Skip to Menu
  2. Skip to Content
  3. Skip to Footer
Wednesday, May 16th 2012 
10:04pm

Stay Connected:

FacebookTwitterYoutube

Sipology Coffee: A Small Business Gone Ugly


Steppa S (as posted on Yelp)

10:34am | Sipology was gritty-gorgeous, a split-level piece of open floor-planning with an aesthetically pleasing, lived-in look, its upstairs tables giving out on a lovely view of the East Village from the Broadlind corner the coffeehouse occupied.

What was going on beneath the surface was far less pretty, and Sipology owners closed up shop last August with a long list of employees, vendors, and investors feeling lied to and owed tens of thousands of dollars.1

*

On April Fools' Day, 2009, Isaac Guanajuato and Oscar Orosco opened Sipology Coffee on the corner of Linden Avenue and Broadway, by filling a void left when the The Broadlind Cafe closed up shop months earlier.

Charlene Russell, who was on board as Sipology's first manager, says that "from the get-go" Sipology had problems paying employees. But she says it was in June 2010, when Guanajuato and company opened up a second location (at Temple Avenue and Broadway) that things took a significant turn for the worse. 
"I knew from the beginning that they couldn't pay people at the one store," Russell says. "So I knew when they opened a second one and a restaurant that it was going to end badly."

The restaurant, Red: A Sipology Kitchen, opened in Bixby Knolls the following September -- a period when former employees say Sipology was bouncing checks left and right, with Guanajuato leading them on by giving them sporadic payments straight from the cash register.

"The Sipology meltdown was an absolute nightmare," remembers Jasper Oliver, employed at Sipology from September 2010 to May 2011. "My personal theory is that the owners' eyes were just bigger than their stomachs. They tried to expand too quickly […] and as a result owed money all over town. I actually have no idea how big it got except for little hints like the City [contacting Sipology] for rent not paid or the electricity being shut off on Valentine's Day because that bill wasn't paid."

Oliver says he "constantly" had trouble getting paid. "Checks would bounce," he says. "The owners would be absent during paydays and get exasperated and power-trip when asked point blank for paychecks due. […] Ridiculous."

Dave Van Patten, one of Sipology's original employees, who remained on board until December 2010, tells a similar story: "The whole time I worked there maybe two paychecks were on time. […] You pretty much had to twist their arm [to get paid]. They'd pretty much lie to your face. Pretty sociopathic."
Says Russell, "The way they went about trying to pay people, they were con artists. There was no payroll, like [at] a regular job. Everything was cash. You can only hope they were paying their taxes."

Like Oliver, Russell says she saw signs of financial problems beyond paying employees, such a letter from Los Angeles County regarding fraudulent checks. "They had to have written hundreds," she says. "It's astounding how much money they owe. It's astounding they're not in jail."

An outsider owed money by Sipology is Jeff Duggan of Portola Coffee Lab, a coffee-roaster excited at the opportunity to take on Sipology as his first big client. "I was very eager for business," he says. "It was potentially a big account for me, and I wanted to do everything I could to maintain it."
That eagerness, he says, led to his letting himself be strung along by Guanajuato for far too long. "At the time I thought he was genuine, but he really is not," says Duggan. "I see it now."

Duggan says Sipology fell behind on payments "almost immediately," and that after the third month Duggan finally broached the subject -- and got "a whole song and dance" from Guanajuato.

"Isaac will do anything to get his way, and he really doesn't care at all," Duggan says. "[He] would do things like make large partial payments [for past-due bills] -- like if I dropped of $600 of coffee, they would pay $1,000."

Duggan says he finally told Guanajuato, "'I'm not going to sit here and finance your business interest-free.' [But] then they came up with a cockamamie story about getting some investment money -- I think it was $90,000 -- from the City because they were in a historic district. […] They pitched a good story, and I continued to supply them."

Duggan estimates that Sipology closed owing him about $22,000, and reports that Guanajuato and Orosco do not return his calls. "Every time I think about it, my blood boils," he says.

Tiffany Semoy Davy worked at both Sipology locations, as well as the restaurant, between August 2010 and May 2011. She recounts how in October 2010 she received from Guanajuato the first of what would be many paychecks that bounced. 

Subsequent to that incident, Davy says she received some cash payments from Guanajuato -- though often he would arrange to make these payments not at Sipology, but out of his apartment or car.

"I wasn't like the first person they owed money to," she says, "At some point they started paying us from the drawer. […] They hired new people to replace everyone who quit."

Arturo Enciso, who in May 2011 became one of the last hires at Sipology's East Village location, echoes the reports of other Sipology employees -- and indicates that even so late in the game Guanajuato was continuing to string his employees along. After Enciso's first paycheck bounced, he says Guanajuato "acted like he'd never seen something like that. But […] I found out later he was acting like that to people for a year."

However, Davy notes that not all of the Sipology owners were cut from the same ethical cloth. "I started to see the problems that were happening [at the East Village location] weren't happening at the other location," she says. "The other owner, Mike [Gutierrez], was more on top of it. I really liked him and how he tried to handle things."

Gutierrez says his involvement with Sipology began as a customer who, ostensibly because of his eight years of experience in restaurant management, was approached by Guanajuato at end of 2009 about opportunity of starting up that second location.

"I had no idea of the trouble that they were in," Gutierrez says. "From everything I knew as a customer it looked like things were tip-top, and it was just an opportunity for myself to get into business on my own."
For a while Gutierrez's entire focus was on the day-to-day operations of his location, which he ran without the aid of Guanajuato and Orosco. But eventually it dawned on him that all was not well in the world of Sipology.

"By the time I realized how things were gonna turn out, it was already a little bit too late for me," says Gutierrez, "and [Guanajuato and Orosco] had already started to disappear."

Understanding that his business was in danger, Gutierrez "did everything I needed to do to make sure all the time and effort I'd put into this location was going to be secure" -- including seeking legal counsel, which informed him of the steps he needed to take to protect his investment and separate completely from Sipology.

"I don't know if their eyes were bigger than their stomachs, or what the deal was," Gutierrez says. "But I got into this with the best of intentions."

Like Gutierrez, Nathan Israel was a customer Guanajuato approached to help expand the Sipology brand. "He was looking for people to come in with money, or find somebody who could come in and invest," Israel says.

After listening to Guanajuato's pitch and visiting the soon-to-be-closed Trattoria Limone to verify the quality of the physical space and the customer base that seemed to be in place, Israel invested in Red: A Sipology Kitchen.

But within a couple of months of opening, Israel -- who says he was neither involved in the day-to-day operations of the restaurant, nor was he at any time part of Sipology Coffee Co., LLC -- was tipped off to the fact that employee and vendor checks were bouncing. 

"I don't remember what [explanation Guanajuato] told me," Israel says, "but from that point on it was kind of a red flag. Unfortunately, I was already invested. […] It doesn't really matter what he told me -- actions speak louder than words."

Israel says that by the end of 2010 it was apparent that the Sipology enterprise was in dire trouble. "It was at the point where it was like, 'Oh my god.' […] They grew way too quickly, and then it became like they were robbing Peter to pay Paul. And you can't really do that. […] At that point in time I began to see the ship starting to sink."

By June 2011 the restaurant was out of business, with Israel minus his investment and numerous vendors and employees owed money. Israel reports some relatively recent communication with Orosco regarding settling up at least a portion of the restaurant's debts to vendors, but it is unclear if Orosco is serious about making these payments. 

"I'll say this," Israel relates: "he hasn't made good on any outstanding debts yet."

And as for Guanajuato? "Isaac won't speak to me," Israel says. "I told him straight up that he's unethical, that he lacks conscience. […] After the restaurant closed and [the East Village location] was dwindling, he was gone a month before this place closed. He left it to the employees. There was no communication between the employees and him; he walked away from it. How do you walk away from a business and not tell your employees anything? They're not getting paid, they don't know what's going on…. It's that type of actions that tell you what kind of guy he is."

Like Duggan, Israel was told by Guanajuato that Sipology was receiving money from the City that would help keep the endeavor afloat.

"I've heard that they were into the City for money from the RDA; I don't know if that's true," Israel says. "I know they owe a lot of people a lot of money. […] It's sad, because it really could have been a good thing. "

Look for Part 2 this story within the next week to find out what has risen from Sipology's ruin, and what remains nothing but ashes. 

1 Not to mention one local author out five copies of his novel and/or proceeds from sales thereof. (That author's having a reading 7 p.m. Monday at Portfolio Coffeehouse, BTW. Dig.)


Jamilah M (as posted on Yelp)



Share this Story:

Add a Comment:
Archived Comments (41)
John B. Greet
A very sad tale, nicely told, Greggory. It is tough enough for small businesses these days without well-intended investors and vendors and trusting employees being bilked by fraudulent owners.

The unanticipated always pops up. No business plan survives, entirely intact, first contact with a floundering economy. The difference between an an honorable person and a dishonorable one, is in how he or she chooses to react to such challenges.

I look forward to part 2!
journalist
did you make attempts to contact the owners? Doesnt say.

How about verify with city that Sipology was to receive money?

Jenni
@ John - are you giving the "fraudulent" owners a pass due to the bad economy & hardships associated with being a small business owner? I think these guys should be in jail. If you can get put away for years for shoplifting merchandise worth a fraction of what these hucksters stole, why shouldn't these two be sitting behind bars?
And what, pray tell, should the "honorable" vendors & employees who were ripped-off do?
Question for Greggory
How is this series of events similar to/different from the final days of the District Weekly?
Ryan M
I walked in there last year... wanted to get a blended coffee drink, but their prices were outrageous. Never stepped foot in there again. Good riddance.
John B. Greet
@Jenni: No. I give no one who violates the law a pass. But to my knowledge neither Guanajuato nor Orosco have as yet to be formally charged with anything, let alone convicted. If they are charged and convicted, then I hope they serve the full sentence allowed by law.

As to the former vendors and employees, if they believe that they are victims of crime, they should have that documented in a police report. If they believe they have a cause of action in civil court, I think they should file that lawsuit right away. If Guanajuato and Orosco are found civilly liable, I hope the plaintiffs receive the maximium civil judgment the law allows.
Greggory
journalist: Be sure to read Part 2.
Clarissa
I wondered what happened to this place. Good to finally find out.
David Phinney
I hosted the Open Mic at Sipology for a year and a half. Except for the pleasure of meeting some of LB's best musicians (and a couple of good comics)it was a thankless experience. Had to continue using my own equipment and all I could get out of 'em was a cup of coffee. On the bright side, they had some GREAT employees. Too bad, some of them had to take it in the shorts on the way out.
al
I owned a small cafe down the street, while like the article says it looked good in the outside, they had many dissatisfied customers, often coming into my place venting. They even closed down for a week, while filming a MTV special. I heard the made big bucks. They were always getting monies from the productions being filmed. Too bad they didn't share that wealth with their employees.
Tuan T.
Three words. Small claims court. Sounds and smells like fraud. Get a good lawyer and get your money back!
John Royce
The question of what happened with Sipology Red in California Heights is one that I get often. It was a complete surprise to all of us, especially since I had been to the restaurant twice in the two weeks before it closed. I even asked Nathan how business was and he said they had been pretty busy. While Cal Heights has most definately embraced Sipolgy's replacement, the Blackbird Cafe, a breakfast and lunch cafe that has already become part of the fabric of the neighborhood, I'm sure many will be sorry to hear this sad account of events that led to Sipology's end, especially if investors, like Nathan and others, were taken for an ugly ride.
As for the money that may have been available due to the fact that were in an historic district? Likely another in the string of alleged lies. First, the actual Cal Heights historic district boundaries do not include commercial areas, so the Sipology space was not within the historic district proper. Second, Cal Heights has never fallen within RDA or any other zone that qualifies it to receive special funding. That fact is was has driven our association to be self-supporting, generating our own fundraising to maintain our activities, communications, community projects and ongoing investments.
I wish everyone who was deceived the very best, and if illegal activities were indeed a part of the Sipology mystery, may restitution be in the works for those who were taken advantage of.
The Beer Baron
It is very unfortunate that Sipology Temple got sucked into the mess created by Guanajuato. From the get go, the Temple location felt different. Mike Gutierrez has done a great job holding things together through this tough time. I hope he manages to keep the new Temple Coffee shop running as good as he has for the past year.

The closures of the other Sipology locations obviously had nothing to do with the floundering economy since Temple survived. It seems like a simple case of bad management and expanding way too fast. Lies and deception are not the way to fix a mess like that. Guanajuato and Orosco need to be held accountable for thier debts.
Sherry
The Broadway and Temple location became Temple Coffee with Mike Guiterrez as the owner. Great atmosphere, good coffee. It seems well run; hopefully they make a go of it.
Pigeon
There is no point in filing a civil suit in California. You cannot recover lawyer's fees as the state has taken the position that civil suits should be settled between the parties. When you encounter someone who either has no money or is a complete fraud, including lawyer defendants, you simply will never come out ahead. Chalk it up to experience and never let this kind of fraud happen to you again.
LB_Res2
This is truly sad! Sounds similar to the owners over at Ripples. Good luck to all four owners (2 at each location)...
Brian
Wow this is one heartbreaking drama-filled story. I mean it's got a little bit of everything going on. I can tell you one thing, not making payroll is inexcusable. They should be taken to court no doubt. I know that cash flow is one of the trickiest areas for any business, but it sounds like the owners were not being responsible.
Former Landlord
Lopez vs Guantajuato April 2010 - ruling in favor of landlord Lopez with $7,270.10 owed in back rent, plus legal fees. After a series of stories and "partial payments" used to string landlord along not take legal action... When we did receive rent after making several visits to our house for rent and to the coffeeshop, payments were a mix of checks from personal accounts and Sipology business account. Isaac finally left after court order and sherrif lock out leaving behind trash and junk personal items for landlord to by law have to store and then eventually have hauled away. We believed that as a fellow small business owner, he was responsible and committed to being a good tenant despite his lack of credit.
In the end, we chaulked it up to bad karma built up for him. The loss of Sipology was not a day of mourning for us.

We are, however, saddened that innocent investors, vendors, and hard working employees were dragged into this mess.
John
You know, as an investor you should know EXACTLY WHERE your money is going and HOW it is being spent. How do you "give" a business a large amount of money and not know HOW it's being spent? It's definitively not smart on the part of the investor, ANYBODY can tell you that. As far as the employees, I don't see why they are complaining now. If they had any sense and if what they are saying is true, why not leave after the first, or from what the story says the second or third time they didn't get paid. It's hard to believe that anybody would work for free. Apparently it wasn't too bad if they stayed there for that long.

Also I would like to repeat what @journalist has posted:

did you make attempts to contact the owners? Doesn't say.

How about verify with city that Sipology was to receive money?
Greggory
"Question for Greggory": Ha. Yes, not a scenario with which I have no personal experience. (For anyone who doesn't know what we're talking about, see http://www.lbpost.com/business/greggory/8987.)
Daisy
Greggory there are a lot of people who can give you the other side of this story. You don't have ALL of the correct information. You are convincing people that the owners are con artists when you don't even have the FULL STORY. How about getting a hold of more people? I think people would appreciate reading more than one opinion.
D-Man
These guys were either spending too much money on stuff, or they had a bad coke habit. I'm guessing the latter.
Greggory
Daisy: I'd say I've included a lot more than ONE opinion here; it's just that everyone's story is consistent with everyone else's. As for trying to include the "other side," well, be sure not to miss Part 2.
Journalist 2
It's unethical,inexcusable and just poor journalism to wait until "part 2" to give your story balance, dude. Wow.
Alex
The valuable lesson here for all employees; if you don't get paid, walk out the door. I can't imagine why so many people would work for so long without getting paid. If the crew quit, this place would have shut down a lot sooner, as it should have, and there wouldn't be so much collateral damage.
notinourbackyard.org
Folks, let's focus here. All of the employees and possibly Vendors need to go to the CA DEPARTMENT of LABOR, in person and file a claim for unpaid wages; SECONDLY, go online to the CA DEPT. FAIR EMPLOYMENT & HOUSING and fill out a claim form and schedule a telephone interview. Next two stops: County of Los Angeles BOARD OF EQUALIZATION to report Business Tax Fraud (pd only in cash); and lastly EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT to file a claim for PAYROLL TAX FRAUD and have their EIN # revoked. This is the first steps you all need to take before you even think about filing a Small Claims Court or Civil Lawsuit. You have a Statute of Limitations that will protect you and give you time to file all these complaints which will only support you in Court and empower you with the ability to obtain a LEGAL JUDGMENT which is what you can use to cease assets like liens on Bank Accounts, IRS refunds and Garnishment of wages. I understand everyone is venting here and someone had the wisdom of using the free press to expose this potential corruption, BUT herein is where I believe "WE THE PEOPLE" have failed one another. There are systems in place for this type of activity. Everyone's advice about Karma and wrist-slapping is evidence of a disease called apathy or ignorance. SERIOUSLY, if you are an employee, vendor or investor -then you have just as much responsibility to know your rights and what you have in front of you to protect those rights. The same would hold true for any Employer. You could all form a Corporation and pursue a Class-Action Law-suit against said owners. And here is the good news: I am not a lawyer nor an advocate. I am an ordinary citizen just like you. I am not trying to sell you anything. If I could package and sell you something, it may be a big kick in the pants or a wake-up call that no one seems to be giving the advice I am offering.
Salty Sean
Is it really ANY surprise at all to anyone who lives in this city that this place went out of business the way it did? Historically Long Beach has a really great reputation for allowing really bad people wanting to bilk people/Long Beach out of their money and then split. Sipology is just one with a long line of predecessors before it and I am sure a line of successors to follow it, IN THE SAME LOCATION that will dupe people and the city out of money. Look at all the restaurants on Pine that open and close their doors with such frequency you can't even call to make a reservation because by the time you get down to the restaurant they could've gone out of business! And YES, this is partially the city's fault because of their stupid rules and regulations about trying to keep Long Beach unique and therefore no chain establishments on pine and Second Street or some lame excuse like that.
Former Employee
Many of the former employees, after quitting their jobs, have filed for wages owed. Some have already had court dates, to which the owners were no shows.
Dave P
Thank you for the informative story. I had heard many different rumors but it is good to know more of the story. Issac was a charming guy and used it to his full advantage. It is especially disturbing to hear the employees got shafted. Some of them where really nice and the ones that weren't, Well maybe they had a good reason.
The Man CityLife
This was a great blog. I really enjoyed it.

I had no idea that shadiness that was going on. I took a date to Red before and it was some GREAT food, I interacted w/ Nathan and he's a cool guy who was just trying to make that business prosper.

He thought out of the box and had DJ's playing music that played to the crowd, and he even hopped on the 1s and 2s.

Too bad the owner suckered everyone into doing business with him. Can't wait to read Pt. 2.
Jasper Oliver
I don't think any of us former employees would disagree that we should have quit sooner than we did. But we DID quit. There was a mass exodus of employees in early May.

Furthermore a lot of my co-workers DID file claims with the department of labor.

We were many working second and third (and in my case fifth) jobs to pay rent and actively seeking employment elsewhere. We had private passions, goals, and dreams we were working towards while making espressos. I had a theatre company in my living room, Lauren was writing a book. Some of us had families that we working to support.

In those conditions I can understand sticking something out as it went from annoying to unbearable. The prospect of being unemployed with no other job lined up was not thrilling to me. In the end I made some mistakes. I trusted too much and was not active enough in making my lot better. In the end, despite everything, it worked out for me, I got my money and got a much much better job. Would that the rest were as lucky.

I can sympathize with and understand the mentality of all those who were taken advantage of by Isaac and Oscar.

I can also understand how this article could look like just a lot of complaining from people who let themselves be taken advantage of. It's a complicated time that we're living in. It's important that articles like this one expose corruption as we all struggle for our future. I think it's also important that we stick together.

We all learned a lot from the Sipology meltdown.
i love long beach
Salty Sean: you win the prize for most ignorant and useless comments:

1. what could "the city" have done in this case? Tell us how, when handing out permits for businesses, the city can know who is going to rip off their employees, other than checking criminal background (which they do)?

2. What restaurants on pine open and close so often? Tell us.

3. No chains on pine? Hm, i think i recall hooters being there. None on second street? Are you blind, or just stoned?

get a clue
Spike In LB
Anyone that continues working after that pay check bounces or is late is an idiot.

Everyone seems to hate on Starbucks but you never hear these stories coming from their employees.

I walked into Sipology once, they had no selection of breakfast pastries. I walked.
JR
A small correction... The Blue Nile Coffeehouse closed at the end of 2006. More than 2 years before the opening of Sipology (not "months before"). In early 2007 Blue Nile was succeeded by The Broadlind Cafe which operated at the same location for roughly a year and a half, before it subsequently closed in late 2008... "months before" the opening of Sipology.
Fedup
The problem with capitalism is that it takes too long, and leaves too much damage, for an errant company to finally close.

Yet, I find it ironic that people are encouraging victims to go to the government for assistance, while we are trying to cut their staffs, salaries, and pensions.

I wish all of us the best of luck.
LB RES
What a waste of a great location. I was so happy to read that the Temple location is (or at least now it is) a separate entity - I love that new coffee shop and really hope they make it!
Greggory
Journalist 2: Wow, dude, you really can't figure out why the "balance" isn't here? Well, Part 2 will clue you in.

JR: Thanks for the correction. I've always gotten those two places confused in my memory.
Johnny Local
From coffee houses to restaurants to retailers, this ain't a new story. It happens time and time again. Imagine what more-corporate entities and franchises are doing that are never publicized?
My family and I are regulars at Temple Coffee (Mike Gutierrez's off-shoot) and are more than happy to support a well-run and friendly local business. Best of luck to Mike on moving forward, and much strength to the employees and vendors of Sipology, that they all get their due.
Bob Dobbs
Greggory, journalist 2 is right. This story has no balance. Why wait for part two? Why not present both sides at the same time? Are you being sensational or just lazy? It's sad to think this is what passes for journalism these days. Also, it was a nice touch poaching the photos from Yelp. Did you bother to ask "Steppa S" and "Jamilah M" to use their photos? I doubt it.
john wk
those dudes and their coffee sucked.
Waiting for Part 2
I thought I was going to read it within the week?

Sponsors