1. Skip to Menu
  2. Skip to Content
  3. Skip to Footer
Wednesday, May 22nd 2013 
2:40am
Cloudy

63°F

Cloudy

Wind: 6 mph

Stay Connected:

FacebookTwitterYoutubeFeed

Protesting with Your Wallet and Ballot in the World's 8th-Largest Economy

View Comments

12:00pm | That's right: if California were a country, our economy would be in of the world's Top Ten.
                                                                                                                               
This fact helps underline how much impact a statewide economic initiative like "the California Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act of 2012," a great idea with an unwieldy name.

How much genetically-engineered food are we eating? According to the Huffington Post, "It's estimated that 75 percent of the processed foods on supermarket shelves in the U.S. contain genetically engineered ingredients. Eighty-eight percent of U.S. corn, 94 percent of soybeans and 93 percent of canola are presently grown with genetically engineered seeds."1

Passing the California Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act would be a societal plus, if for no other reason than we should get to know what we're eating (knowledge that individuals may employ as we see fit). But considering that organizations from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) have expressed concerns about the safety of genetically-modified foodstuffs -- "[R]espected experts argue that some genetically engineered crops may also pose serious health and environmental risks,"2 says the UCS's Doug Gurian-Sherman -- the least food producers should be required to do if they're going to profit from this potential danger is give us a chance to avoid it.

You may not be shocked to find out that leading the pack of corporations that will end up pouring millions of dollars into a campaign against this initiative (since we all know the truth will be bad for business) is the Monsanto Company, which supplies the technology behind 90 percent of the genetically-modified crops in the world.3

Survey Monsanto's press clippings over the past decade, and it's hard not to feel this is a pretty evil corporation.4 They sue farmers for replanting seeds that naturally result from crops born of Monsanto's genetically-modified seeds. They sue farmers when those seeds contaminate a farmer's field without his knowledge. They have fudged research on some of their products.5 The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has dubbed Monsanto "potentially responsible" for environmental contamination at over 50 Superfund sites. The title of a 2008 Vanity Fair exposé sums it up nicely: "Monsanto's Harvest of Fear."

But it seems to me Monsanto would be worth boycotting simply for its resistance against a law requiring that the public be provided with information on what we're eating, because disliking the outcome of transparency is no reason to lobby against it. Monsanto is free to put its considerable PR department to work on "educating" the public that genetically-modified foodstuffs are innocuous (or I should say: free to do so providing they don't fudge facts in the name of profit). But I don't believe Monsanto should be in the business of inhibiting your right to make an informed decision about what you put into your body.

So I encourage you not only to vote Yes on "the California Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act," but also to boycott Monsanto products. The picture accompanying this article -- a picture that is making its rounds on the Web -- should help you in that pursuit.

Hey, there are some products on this list that I use(d), too. But no one said acting on conscience is always convenient. 
Footnotes:

1 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/annie-spiegelman/genetically-engineered-food_b_1245023.html

2 See, for example, this 2009 study published in the International Journal of Biological Studies, which concludes , "Our analysis clearly reveals for the 3 GMOs new side effects linked with GM maize consumption, which were sex- and often dose-dependent. Effects were mostly associated with the kidney and liver, the dietary detoxifying organs, although different between the 3 GMOs. Other effects were also noticed in the heart, adrenal glands, spleen and haematopoietic system."
 
3 See http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/news/features/monsanto_movie080307/.

4 For an overview, see http://organicconsumers.org/monsanto/index.cfm.

5 See http://www.ethicalinvesting.com/monsanto/aspartame.shtml.


For your boycotting pleasure, a list of Monsanto-owned and Monsanto-related companies.
 

on Twitter for latest updates and breaking news.

Share this Story:

Add a Comment:
Archived Comments (8)
Oh Well
Looks like I'm going hungry.
LBNative
Monsanto does not own the companies on this list. This is misinformation and why did the LB Post not check this out before slapping it on here? For example: Hershey and Nestle Carnation are competitors. The above may purchase ingredients from Monsanto, but they are not owned by Monsanto.
Jack
I wouldn't shake up your bottle of canola oil...you might mix up the part you intend to use with the rest that you throw?, donate?, or give away. How do you separate an egg? Really??
Jay
Morningstar?! Is NOTHING sacred anymore?
get it right
Yeah, where's the fact checking? Greggory Moore finds some bogus jpeg on a kooky blog and passes it off as journalism? ConAgra is not owned by Monsanto. General Mills is not owned by Monsanto. These are companies in which Monsanto may have a small ownership stake - along with a million other shareholders, including a lot of ordinary people with 401ks and mutual funds. LBPost needs to issue a retraction. And Moore needs to put a little more effort into his articles rather than just ripping off other blogs.
Healthy Eater
Shouldn't be too hard for anyone that is concerned with eating properly to boycott Monsanto's processed food products. Which is what Monsanto offers-- food products, NOT actual food.
lucho
you decide on your health, and your right to know what you eat. if the companies mentioned above are using monsanto products, you decide if you want to support them. monsanto may not own them, but the compaies use monsanto products. you decide. it's your health, and your life, and that of your loved ones. if profits before life are more important, you decide. i also have the right to know what i eat, and in the mean time i stay away from food i don't know its content. to a healthy nation because we say so!
John B. Greet
People should be able to have ready access to factual information about the foods they choose to consume. The "California Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act" sounds like a good way for the people of this state to assert more control over this important aspect of their lives.

I am not interested in federal government involvement in this issue except where it concerns federal lands, federal properties, or federal employees.) In fact, I would personally love to see the FDA de-funded and disbanded altogether and those authorites and responsibilities returned to the individual states or to the people, where they properly belong.

Popular Now

See more

New in the Marketplace

See more