1. Skip to Menu
  2. Skip to Content
  3. Skip to Footer
Saturday, May 18th 2013 
12:24am
Fair

64°F

Fair

Wind: 3 mph

Stay Connected:

FacebookTwitterYoutubeFeed
as  

What Distracted Driving Awareness Month Meant in Practice

View Comments

This photo, taken on June 2 by the author, is said by the author to depict a driver who is texting while driving down Ocean Boulevard.

9:45am | As you might have heard (here, for example), April was Distracted Driving Awareness Month, a statewide campaign by over 200 state agencies and 100 California Highway Patrol area commands to combat the bane of driving while using a handheld communication device (like that snazzy iPhone you waited in line to get even though when it came out it was more expensive and had more bugs than it ever would) through a combination of concentrated enforcement and focused public-relations work. 

The Long Beach Police Department took part. How? Sgt. Rico Fernandez, a department spokesman, says primarily by way of "two days of focused distracted driving enforcement operations," those days being April 6 and 27, during which the LBPD wrote 171 citations for using a cell phone while driving and 4 for texting while driving. 

For the entire month, the LBPD handed out 1,237 cell-phone citations and 59 for texting. 

How does that compare with an average month? Fernandez says that in February the LBPD handed out 864 cell-phone citations and 39 for texting; while in March the numbers were up to 1,073 and 72, respectively.

The Long Beach Post is awaiting comment from the LBPD on why the percentage jump between February and March was even greater than it was between March and April. We are also awaiting the May statistics. 

Traffic Section Sgt. Doug Bender explains that the "focused distracted driving enforcement operations" mostly entail motorcycle officers being special detailed for distracted drivers for those two days. The reason that an operation like this cannot be continual is two-fold: extra officers cost money, and when an officer is special detailed, his or her focus is on the pertinent offenses to the exclusion of all others.  

As Bender relates, "When we're funded by [for example] the Office of Traffic Safety — say, through a grant operation — that operation is paying for the officers." 

Bender says that because of the dangers posed by motorists using handheld communication devices while driving — "Distracted driving does cause collisions," he says, "there's no doubt about that" — the Office of Traffic Safety is considering shifting its focus from the "Click it or Ticket" program — so successful that the seatbelt non-compliance rate has gotten very low toward a distracted-driving program. 

While I have Sgt. Bender on the phone, I ask why the LBPD is not employing my so-obvious-it's-silly scheme to bust pertinent violators — namely, by sticking an undercover officer on a spot (say, on Ocean Boulevard, as I did one day during the Grand Prix) with a camera to clock offenders and a radio to hail a uniformed officer a half-mile or so away to stop the offending motorist and write the ticket. The only reason they don't do this, said the good sergeant, is not legal but logistical: too few officers to regularly employ a couple on such a specific detail. "It's staffing and funding," said Bender. "We could do that, but for practical purposes we haven't so far." 

This photo, taken on June 2 by the author, is said by the author to depict a driver who is texting while driving down Ocean Boulevard.

on Twitter for latest updates and breaking news.

Share this Story:

Add a Comment:
Archived Comments (10)
koolaide
You' know, i've seen Long Beach Police officers talk on cell phones and texts while they are driving their squad car about the city. They should be setting a good example for the public; but then again; i guess the law doesn't apply to them since they are the one enforcing it; should i be writing down their squad car numbers and report them as well? Maybe the higher ups should set a date or training about enforcing the laws and policing themselves as well. Seems ignorant on their part that's all.
John B. Greet
Great work, LBPD. Keep it up!
FedupinLB
Come on now LB Post. The driver in this photo was also facing backwards and driving with their feet. But you really can't see that either.
LB Local
I'm sorry, but wouldn't the revenue from the citations pay for the extra officers and then some? As a motorcyclist, I've been struck three times by "behind the wheel occupants" (let's face it, they're no longer actually driving the vehicle). Not to mention how many close calls I evade EVERY DAY as they nearly run me down. I've been waiting for it to become enough of a problem to the other car drivers for police to start doing more to curtail the behavior. And waiting... And waiting...
cowgirlsoul
I teach traffic safety classes - for folks who get a ticket and want to remove the point - and I hear koolaide's comment all the time in class. It is, in my opinion, a childish response to an adult issue. Officers are trained on how to handle a car in an "Oh Crap" moment something the average driver is not. Plus they use the on board computer system for updates, wants and warrants and other job related tasks. When the general public has the training and experience to drive while talking and texting then we all can do it. Until then, I want drivers on the road with me to focus their attention to act of driving. Too many lives are lost, and people injured needlessly. If that call is THAT important - Pull over and stop the car.
Anonymous just in case
I always see idiots texting while on the freeway doing 70+... ridiculous.

Occasionally I'll read or write a text while waiting at a red light. Is that also illegal? I'd assume not. As soon as the light turns green I toss the phone in my passenger seat and continue at the next red light.
TEXTKILLS
We thank you so much for stepping up enforcement in your area if we can ever be of any assistance to any distracted driving outreaches you conduct please feel free to give us a call.'TextKills, an advocacy group committed to road safety, is dedicated to increasing awareness of the dangers of distracted driving. With the proliferation of Smartphones and the constant streaming of information to and from these and other 'smart' mobile communication devices, texting while driving (TWD) is now an epidemic that results in thousands of fatalities and 100's of thousands of injuries annually. TextKills educates the public through social media campaigns and school tours in order to promote policies and programs aimed at enhancing greater personal responsibility and safety awareness among drivers and, ultimately, eliminating TWD from our roadways.'
In 2010, TextKills launched a tour to rally college and high-school students against the dangers of TWD. Our team presented information to these students and encouraged each attendee to sign a promise to pay attention when driving. We also promoted a mobile application designed to help drivers resist the urge, and temptation, to engage in TWD. The TextKills blog (www.textkills.com) documented each stop along the way as the tour eventually found its way to the 2010 Distracted Driving Summit, hosted by the U.S. Department of Transportation in Washington, D.C. TextKills strongly believes that it is critical to direct its mission to the youth of this country, given the findings of a 2009 government study that found that the under-20 age group comprised the largest percentage, by age category, of distracted drivers.
During 2011, TextKills will continue to strive for a surge in pledges and media coverage so as to further spread its mission of safety, attention to road laws and mobile communications etiquette. The group's goal is to instill these principles into the next generation of drivers and smart device users, so that like taking the precaution of buckling up a seatbelt, undistracted driving and responsible mobile communications practices will no longer be just a dream, but rather a life-saving reality.
So I ask you, "Do you agree that texting while driving is a bad practice?"
DriveReplyâ„¢ for iPhone, BlackBerry and Android was designed to combat cell phone usage behind the wheel. It features customizable auto-replies and utilizes GPS technology to detect when your vehicle is in motion. It is feature rich and easy to use. Some of the features include personalization, customization of replies, cyber bullying protection with a no-reply list, and enhanced convenience and security with a unique My Drive 5 -- ringing a unique tone, if any of your significant persons try to reach you at a time when you should be focused on the road. Learn more at the website (www.drivereply.com).
Features:
• Safely monitor the a Smartphone's incoming calls and text messages while the vehicle is traveling at a rate of speed at or greater than 10-15MPH
• Provide customization in auto-reply messages for inbound calls and inbound text messages while the vehicle is in motion
• Provide personalized responses, so that a recipient would be identified by name in automated replies received
• Provide a No-Reply List (blacklist)for individuals that will not receive automated replies from the app user
• Provide a My Drive 5™ List (whitelist) for important individuals that user designates must get through with phone calls or text messages (to the user) in the event of a possible emergency
• Provide a passenger selection option, should the user be a passenger, rather than a driver, and desire to disable the auto-reply function of the app
• Provide a Battery Alert System to notify a driver that their battery is running low, so that the driver can safely pull over to plug the phone in to a charging system and maintain theDriveReply™ service
• DriveReply™ is available in English and Spanish language versions
LB Lover
@cowgirlsoul - I don't think koolaide's comment is childish -- In fact, I think it speak to a much bigger problem: When are the cops in LB going to start following ALL of the laws they're paid to enforce? This goes far beyond texting while driving.
koolaide
@cowgirlsoul; i think you don't get what i was addressing; i have no problems with officer using their on board computer and screens; it's the actual cell phone in their hands that i see all the time while they are driving; i know a thing or two about law enforcement in my past life; and i do have the defensive driving and quick maneuvering experiences as well; it's just the ignorance of being a lawman that bothers me and i think they should be setting a good example for the general public; wanted to remind them that they are not above the actual written law...see what i mean cowgirlsoul? :)
Jeff
I think this is just one step in the process. Sure, you can make it illegal, but people will still do it... and blocking technology will only anger them.

I'm a big fan of new apps like Onmaway (http://www.OnmawayApp.com) that actually help by allowing users to automatically update friends, family, etc. with their location without having to touch their phone.

Brilliant stuff!

Popular Now

See more

New in the Marketplace

See more