|
||||
The Mediocre Road Too Often Taken: A Look At The Downtown Community Plan by Keith Higginbotham | City Beat | 11.10.10 |
+ ![]() 3:15pm | It has been a long road to remake downtown Long Beach, full of ideas and wondrous projects that all promised much and, unfortunately, in many cases, delivered little. First, it was the commercial building boom in the 1980s that proponents said would remake downtown Long Beach into a world-class commercial and business center. Then it was the expansion of the Pine Avenue retail corridor, complete with a mall and promises to remake downtown into a magnet drawing shoppers from near and far. And there was the Promenade, with promises of creating a Santa Monica-like ambiance for pedestrian shoppers and revelers. Then there was the Pike—an epic failure of city planning that has yet to deliver on promises to recreate the viability of the Santa Monica Pier and the excitement of the original Long Beach Pike, but instead has just sucked business away from the already struggling Pine Avenue businesses. And let's not forget the massive attempt to gentrify downtown which has led to bland valleys of loft, condo and rental buildings with perpetually empty ground floor retail. This rush to populate downtown almost simultaneously led to the creation of a forest of soulless high-rise residential developments that turned Ocean Boulevard into a chasm of Miami-esque and faux-Deco monoliths that literally block out the sun and the view. This is not to say the downtown of today has not improved in the past 30 years ago—obviously it has. But all of these promise-filled projects and plans have all fallen well short of remaking downtown into what it could be today—into what each of these plans promised Long Beach would be today. The common threads among all of these attempts to remake downtown Long Beach are simple: a lack of ambition, a lack of imagination, and a lack of leadership. The culprits are just as easily identifiable: those ensconced in purple robes at City Hall. But not to worry, those in purple robes have yet another plan to sell—and this time it is sure-fire doozy. Called the Downtown Community Plan, the square-mile project would include 9,200 new residential units, 2 million square feet of office and retail space and 3,200 hotel rooms to be built over the next 25 years. The plan also sets some serious standards for all development within the project area.In and of itself, the plan is a good thing—just as all the other plans before it sounded great when they were proposed. It's in the execution that the city's officials tend to sell the city so short. Wondrous drawings, blueprints, computer renderings and environmental documents all promise great things. But run, as they all are, through the monochromatic and two-dimensional filter known as City Hall, all excitement, imagination and representation of what Long Beach stands for is lost forever. It is a constant and pervasive acceptance of mediocrity. At the City Council meeting Tuesday night, where the Downtown Community Plan was discussed at length, Councilmember Suja Lowenthal supported the plan, adding that, "Development is not anti-resident. Development is not anti-community." And she is right. However, given the track record of mediocre projects and less-than-successful planning churned out by City Hall in the past, there is as good a chance as any that THIS development will end up being anti-resident and THIS development will end up being anti-community. But it need not be this way. Long Beach officials do rise to the occasion at times. The Bikestation project, the Art Exchange, and the Transit & Visitors Information Center are all examples of recent downtown development projects that think outside of the box—that showcase the eclectic vibrancy of Long Beach. But more often than not, what we get are things like the West Gateway project—a massive city-block residential project that has all the soul of a stuccoed East German housing bloc designed in the worst 1950s earth-tones—albeit with modern double-paned windows and air conditioning. And is some cases, City Hall is simply obstructive. Look at what the Port of Long Beach proposed when they were considering building a new administration building to replace their seismically-unfit 50-year old building. The design for the $300 million building was architecturally striking, featured state-of-the-art—in some cases innovative—environmental systems throughout, would have met the highest standards for seismic and sustainable construction, and promised to serve as a national model for modern "green" construction. These were not just some whimsical design features, these were the result of the original goals set down by the port when they first considered the new building nearly a decade ago—basically to create a building that represented Long Beach to the world not only in design but also in concept. Despite the imagination, innovation and thought behind the plan, the port building is not likely to be built. Not because the port can not afford it—it can. It won't be built because City Hall doesn't want it built. Mayor Foster feels that it is inappropriate in these fiscally challenging times to spend such funds on a new port building. This despite the fact that the building would be built without one penny of taxpayer money—it would be funded by port lease revenue and docking fees charged to port tenants. Cruelly ironic is that the proposed port building is exactly the kind of building that the Downtown Community Plan guidelines call for. But, yet again, the bold and creative views of development in Long Beach, no matter how thought out in proposals like the Downtown Community Plan, are lost through the muddled views, puerile egos and freshman politics of City Hall. What City Hall really needs, instead of plan after plan that attempts to fix the problems created by the failures of the previous plans, is a concise defined view of what Long Beach is, what Long Beach can be and what Long Beach should be. What is needed is a defined list of design guidelines that set the minimum standards for what this city will tolerate when it comes to development. And to the credit of the City Hall staff that drafted it, this is exactly what the Downtown Community Plan purports to be. Reading the draft of the plan, and what it calls for in the way of standards of development, would make anyone long to live in that hypothetical city.But where the Downtown Community Plan comes up short is that it does not include any kind of enforcement to assure that City Hall officials follow it's recommendations. Many of the guidelines in the plan are simply suggestions, with no teeth to make sure they are enforced. These standards can, and likely will be, easily forgotten the first time a developer promises to build part of the project at little or no cost to the city (e.g., the Pike). The guidelines in the Downtown Community Plan need to be codified—carved in stone to make sure that the low-road bent of City Hall officials does not water them down. And not just the technical guidelines, but more importantly the subjective guidelines like calling for things like bold dynamic architecture that promotes a vibrant city core and "green" construction that promotes Long Beach as a model community. Of course, the Downtown Community Plan is still a draft and could in its final version include measures to hold City Hall officials accountable to these guidelines. But keep in mind that many of the guidelines proposed in the plan have been around for sometime and they have not, as of late, resulted in the bold, vibrant and green development they call for. No, City Hall has just piled mediocrity on top of mediocrity in the face of these guidelines, all with a seeming "whatever-sticks" philosophy to make downtown into a carbon copy of somewhere else. Instead of being like Santa Monica, or like Citywalk, or for that matter like anywhere else, shouldn't the goal be to make Long Beach the model that others want to be like? And, this is not to eschew development. There is nothing wrong with putting out the sign saying "development welcome." The more development dollars headed to Long Beach the better. But, there have to be some guaranteed standards and goals that ensure that any development not only adds to the roll of housing units or retail spaces in the city, but also represents the city in character and spirit. And if the city is going to set out high standards such as those in the Downtown Community Plan, there must the power to hold City Hall officials accountable to them—no matter what. Why should City Hall officials ever be able to settle for the low road of the mundane and mediocre? And if developers don't want to agree with these new standards, then hit the road, Jack—there is another developer around the corner that would be more than willing to create a world-class portfolio-quality project just by following these more rigid city standards. And if City Hall officials don't abide by the Downtown Community Plan standards, if they revert to their typical acceptance of mediocrity, then they can hit the road, too. There are plenty of people just around the corner willing to wear those purple robes—people more than willing to fight for Long Beach as a bold, vibrant and model community for the rest of the nation.
Comments
Click Here to Join the Discussion on this Story
22 Comments so far.
Paul B Very, very well said. Thanks! Hope you have some impact on this process. TheTruth I just can not imagine what another development plan will actually do... I know big Business and the members of the Chamber of Commerce need to make their money, but seriously at what expense to Long Beach as a whole? Who is it that this plan is hoping to woo? The question that should be asked, is what will drive actual business and job growth? As our consumer based economy continues to pump the brakes, realistically what kind of business will drive actual sustainable jobs? Long Beach should not simply aim to be yet ANOTHER retail center with empty soulless condos and even more hotels. Instead let's be the city that leads the way in innovative creation, both commercially(I'm talking design and production) and creative (arts, digital media, etc...). Our city has soul and creative spirits, let's capitalize on THAT, kind of the way they are up in BK, or over on 4th... Sorry, that's just kind of what I think... Great article! Bill Cwiklo A plan for downtown that purposely ignores the Queen Mary and need for linkages to that property is fatally flawed. Who was responsible for that decision? Rickatsea Amen to that! Make a good, workable,long term plan and stick to it. Make real sure staff gets the word and that would include the plannng committee. Also consider lowering some of the high cost to build in this city. Permits fees are offensive and discourage new construction and business. Sam Lowry I just went to the newly-remodeled Santa Monica Place. It maximum use of its location (it has an ocean view from the EFFIN' FOOOD COURT!), has upscale stores, and is almost directly linked to the already-established and vibrant local entertainment zone, Third Street Promenade. It's as if its planners went to The Pike AND DESIGNED ITS EXACT OPPOSITE. Andreas Great article Keith. Straightforward and to the point. One of the best i've read on this site outside of Brian U's work. We definitely park our car in the same garage. You're absolutely right that this plan will only collect dust unless we all make a commitment to stick to it. It's all about the execution. In theory a plan like this if it was in place 10-15 years ago would have saved us from some of the biggest mistakes we've made such as The Pike, City Place, Aqua, etc. A lot of what was written is somewhat generic. I should know because i wrote the guidelines you mention in the article while i served on the original visioning committee. I'm just a lowly resident hoping for the best. These guidelines were supposed to be detailed out as part of this DCP process but that has never happened. You mention West Gateway, what a pile of crap that is. One person to blame would be Barbi Clark. That's right Barbi, you pushed this down the cities throat and you still work for the city inside the planning dept of all places!? You should be fired, flat out. Barbi Clark everyone, let's hear it for her!! You were told this project did not meet the standards of the vision we were working on back in the day but you pushed it through anyways. For those that really care lets stick together and make this plan a reality. Like Keith says, if you're willing to accept second rate, time to hit the road and make room for people that actually give a damn. Erin It's funny that you say the Transit Center, Bikestation and Art Exchange are the bright side of downtown's recent works. Funny because the DLBA and RDA didn't come up with those plans and had nothing to do with day-to-day production. (I could argue about ArtExchange being "good" but that's another rant!) This Downtown Plan was, way back in the day, largely Craig Beck and Kraig Kojian's idea, from what I understand...so, no surprises that the Plan is about as bold as rice pudding. I would say, let's look at Kraig and Craig's track records and see how they stack up against downtown's relative accomplishments. The leadership and DLBA and RDA have been under fire so often over the years. I am so tired of their shenanigans. DLBA is avoiding the real work and instead politicking another plan! Always planning the jump, never making the leap...while we all hold our breath... Nikol Great article. Ccrockett As a local architect I say AMEN!! It really can't be described any more succinctly than Kieth has. CHARLIE The word is "cheap," Keith, not short... What is the difference? Thanks Keith. Yes, nothing changes in City Hall. Once such proposal is approved, all interest groups, those with $$$, friends etc... show-up and inch by inch the City starts drifting away from the plan. Basically, it is the same old story. Richard Blaine Excellent point with respect to the need for City Hall to stick to the standards that would be adopted along with this plan. However, it's a bit premature to write this article without seeing what is in the revised plan. Recall that the draft was released in June 2009, and there was extensive public comment. I'm curious to see what changes have been made--let's withhold final judgement until we see it. Awake @Erin: "...let's look at Kraig and Craig's track records and see how they stack up..." Yeah, since Kojian started, there has been a gradual and consistent decline in Pine Ave's success and overall marketability. Track record, indeed. It's an exemplary record of how to create failure and blight. In any private sector job, Kojian would be an unemployed statistic. Heck, there are smaller agencies that make a bigger impact for their clients and still earn less than the DLBA. In fact, there are so many competent agencies in Long Beach, the business owners could more easily (and with less expense) do an end-run around the DLBA. The days of centralized services are over. The internet helped to make that bloated business model defunct, years ago. Pine Ave just needs to wake up. But, then again, you can't wake people who are already awake. Juan Pardell Is there any other urban city in the country, which has created a successful metropolis where the retail anchors are a Walmart store and a half-filled strip mall/entertainment complex? LBGlenn Great article, let's not forget the brilliant leadership from City Hall regarding the Kroc Center. Molly I love Long Beach, but have been frustrated for years over the lack of shopping in downtown. We have the perfect weather, people and environment for a district like Third St Promenade, yet can imagine still maintaining downtown Long Beach's artistic vibe with our many art galleries, assuming they would remain. If we could bring some retail, upscale and average priced places like an Urban Outfitters, Gap, MetroMix, Sephora, etc I think it would do wonders in some many aspects. We need stores like that to give people a reason to come to dwtn besides to eat and drink. Plus, i feel like if you give women a place to shop, they'll inevitably eat after!! Eric Good article...we need to make sure the new upcoming developments are up to snuff...unlike the tragic City Place. Jdude I love Long Beach....but the last thing Downtown needs is MORE restaurants. I work at City Place and its just filled with a lot of crazy people, homeless, and a group of loud kids who constantly hang outside causing trouble, Long Beach needs to work on improving places like City Place BEFORE moving onto a next project...baby steps. city zen The day Keith says something positive about Long Beach or its public servants will be the day I got to the doctor to get my eyes checked. I guess the program EIR which will save developers 12-18 months and thousands if not millions of dollars on new projects just wasn't worth mentioning. Or how the DTCP's new development standards allow greater density, which is ecologically and culturally wise. Or what specific suggestions you are offering - other than a vague call for "enforcement", as if zoning standards are going to be written into an unbreakable charter amendment or something. You just like to complain. GMLB Well, I don't like going to Downtown LB because parking is difficult, those meter people enjoy their job way too much. You're not going to get upscale shopping on Pine. Whatever your plans say, you need to deal with things as they are. Anything I liked there has closed or moved. Also, the convention center has absolutely no regard for people the community. They let the Grand Prix and Pride Parade, Marathon and anyone else who buys parking places, work and make noise all night (and I mean all night!) because they bring so much money to the city. I never saw any of the money. Did you? They paid for more parking enforcement officers? When we lived in a high rise by the convention center, they never even offered us a free ticket to any of their events for the inconvenience. Good luck, I'm going to Pedro! oren 25 year plans are job protection for incumbants who don't know what to do now. Business and improvement will come when you give people a reason to want to come downtown. Zil Great discussion of the vision or lack of it of City Hall. As for the POLB building, apparently City Hall is not fully appreciative of the importance of infrastructure from practical and aesthetic standpoints.
City Beat
Keith Higginbotham takes you inside City Hall and reports weekly on the decisions being made.
Keith Higginbotham is a freelance journalist and writer who most recently served as the West Coast editor for the trade magazine American Shipper, covering the shipping and logistics industries. Prior to this, he served as the Advertising and Multimedia Manager for the Port of Long Beach. He began his journalism career more than a decade ago as the Trade and Transportation beat reporter at the Long Beach Press-Telegram.
Keith's Favorite Links
en.wikipedia.org huffingtonpost.com laobserved.com marvel.com/digitalcomics/ poynter.org
Keith's Archives
Show All Archives |
||||
| About Us | Contact Us | Policies | ||||