1. Skip to Menu
  2. Skip to Content
  3. Skip to Footer
Tuesday, May 21st 2013 
5:33am
Cloudy

64°F

Cloudy

Wind: 3 mph

Stay Connected:

FacebookTwitterYoutubeFeed

PT: Former Staffer Speaks Out On Congresswoman Richardson's Questionable Ethics

View Comments

UPDATE 10:00pm | CityWatchLA asks Congresswoman Richardson back in ethics hot water?

UPDATE 10:00pm | Click here for KPPC Public Radio coverage.
 
UPDATE Tuesday 2:00pm | A former district staffer for Congresswoman Laura Richardson, D-Long Beach, who recently resigned, spoke exclusively with the Press-Telegram about her letter that accuses Richardson of ethically questionable behavior.

Click here to read the story in the Press-Telegram.

Maria Angel Macias, who formerly worked as a scheduler in Richardson's district office in Long Beach, told the PT that many of Richardson's staffers were required to "volunteer" their time to work on her most recent re-election campaign. She also said that she scheduled Richardson's campaign-related activities on the taxpayer dime.

Richardson has repeatedly denied that she is again being probed by federal investigators, but Macias said that multiple 37th Congressional District staff members, including herself, have been deposed by ethics investigators and that Richardson paid for an attorney to be present during each session.

Despite the Congressional Ethics Commission's refusal to neither confirm nor deny any potential investigations, the PT is speculating to be an "apparent ethics investigation."

Richardson's spokesman, Communications Director Ray Zaccaro, told the PT via e-mail that 

"no employee in this office has ever been required to perform any work on the campaign."

Zaccaro echoed Monday what Richardson said in November when asked about the validity of claims that she was the subject of another ethics probe: There have been ethics interviews, but they do not constitute an official investigation.
 
Macias said that Richardson often told her to call staff members outside office hours to make them work at campaign events, according to both the PT and
POLITICO.com:

She would just ask me to call them and tell them to come to the campaign office. She would ask me to schedule people (staff members and drivers to accompany Richardson) for campaign fundraisers for other elected officials.
 
On more than one occasion I was asked to do a task or coordinate an event that was on the ethical borderline and not in my job description; things that I was never properly trained on or warned about, and later caused me to be deposed by an ethics investigator with a lawyer present.

It is illegal for congressional staff members to work on campaigns while they are on the clock as Capitol Hill aides. However, they are allowed to work on campaigns outside of regular work schedules when they aren't on the taxpayer dollar.

Zaccaro also noted that House ethics rules permit congressional schedulers to coordinate with campaign schedulers.

Washington-based news website POLITICO.com broke the story on Richardson's potentially being under investigation for a second time in her three years in office after obtaining a copy of the resignation letter. The PT reported that it had obtained a copy of the letter prior to POLITICO.

Macias said the investigation appears to be centering on Deputy District Director Daysha Austin.
Leading up to last fall, when Richardson was running for re-election Nov. 2. Macias said that in the fall leading up to the Nov. 2 election, Austin would "be in the field" most days, but that everyone knew she was working at Richardson's campaign headquarters.

A 2009 Capitol Weekly article noted that she had gone through 18 full-time staffers in just two years.

Macias was once ordered to determine why Richardson's new home stereo was broken upon arrival, she said And on another occasion, the congresswoman forced a staffer to drive her to Pasadena against her will, she said.

"She makes you feel like she owns you," Macias told the PT.

Congresswoman Laura Richardson

UPDATE Monday 1:00pm | Click here for the Press-Telegram's coverage of this story.

Monday 7:30am | POLITICO is reporting about a recent letter of resignation from a former staff member of Long Beach Congresswoman Laura Richardson. The letter blasts Richardson on a variety of fronts including a "toxic" work environment, and reference to being asked on more than one occasion to "do a task or coordinate an event that was on the ethical borderline and not in the job description.”
 
The letter, obtained by POLITICO, appears to indicate Richardson is under investigation again by ethics investigators despite multiple denials by the Congresswoman. 
 
According to POLITICO:

A letter of resignation sent by a former staffer to Rep. Laura Richardson (D-Calif.) appears to indicate that ethics investigators are probing the Los Angeles-area Congresswoman -- a fact Richardson has denied to local reporters.
 
In a copy of the letter obtained by POLITICO, the congresswoman's former district scheduler, Maria Angel Macias, reveals that she was interviewed under oath by ethics investigators, alluding to possible ethics and workplace rules violations.
 
"The office does not comment on confidential personnel matters," Richardson spokesman Ray Zaccaro told POLITICO, who also declined to reveal the subject of the investigation, which is confidential under Congressional rules.
 
The letter describes a "toxic" work environment in Richardson's Long Beach office, and suggests that investigators may be probing government staffers' use for inappropriate purposes.
 
"[O]n more than one occasion I was asked to do a task or coordinate an event that was on the ethical borderline and not in my job description; things that I was never properly trained on or warned about, and later caused me to be deposed by an ethics investigator with a lawyer present," wrote Macias, who until last week was a part-time scheduler with Richardson's office. Macias did not respond to multiple request for comment.
 
"I cannot work in a toxic and hostile environment like this, which is why I resign today," concluded Macias, who is on her second stint on Richardson's staff, and also complained of a " disrespectful way of talking to staff, the lack of regard for family time or personal time off for staff, and the thankless, unappreciative attitude that staff are met with no matter how hard we work."

You can read the full POLITICO story here.
 
Richardson has had a series of damaging stories in numerous publications and has faced ethics questions in her nearly four years in Congress.  She was under investigation by the House Ethics Committee involving a foreclosure on a home she owned in Sacramento but was eventually cleared of any wrongdoing.
 
She has been named by CREW (Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington) as one of the most corrupt members of Congress.
 
Richardson was reelected in November 2010 with more than 68 percent of the vote.

on Twitter for latest updates and breaking news.

Share this Story:

Add a Comment:
Archived Comments (64)
Johnny Utah
Does this mean Starr Parker can take her spot?! :-)
Stu C.
Why should this come as a surprise to anyone in her district? Going all the way back to when she was a 6th district council rep, Richardson has either lied, misrepresented or misused her power. I seem to recall her not residing in her own district, opting instead to live in a "nicer neighborhood" even though she broke the law by doing so. If memory serves, she also provided herself (at L.B. taxpayer expense) with one of the most costly cars (Lincoln Towncar or SUV, I believe) to tool around the city, and God only knows where else. Most of us know how she has personal problems with her own real estate holdings, including foreclosures, due to lack of timely payments to the lending institutions who funding her homes. Her meteoric rise to Congress from that of private citizen in only a few short years may quite possibly be an indication that she was not ready for such a jump, either financially, emotionally or even ethically!
Mike Ruehle
Ex-Long Beach Councilwoman Laura Richardson and her domestic violence ex-husband ex-Long Beach Police Chief Tony Batts sure add to Long Beach's fine reputation. Can't wait to see how the current flock of Long Beach elected leaders can further tarnish Long Beach. Us voters sure know how to pick'em.
Jeremy Colonna
Is anyone surprised? She was on the CREW list from the day she stepped into Congress.
Bixby Knolls Resident
And, yet...this wench was voted in with 67% of the votes in the last election. It is/was well known that Richardson violated various ethics clauses and is a borderline criminal, and still NOTHING will change! If the election was held today, she'd get voted in again. This is SAD! Truly sad.
Brian
This is so sad to me, especially since I know the Congresswoman personally.

@ Johnny Utah, I hate to say this but I almost voted for Starr Parker in this past election. If I had to do it all over again, she just may get my vote. I am a registered Independent, Social Liberal, and Fiscal Conservative.

I also came close to being one of her employees about two years ago, glad that did not workout now.

I hate to see anyone go through this, I hope she works things out.
Eagle Eye
None of this matters, because liberals let other liberals get away with anything. 68% of the vote?! Take a bow LB voters.

You disgust me.

Eagle Eye
Is there a place we can donate, to support a legal push to put her behind bars?

Then again, this is the kind of person many Long Beach citizens WANT. Wow, is it any wonder now why the city, and the STATE for that matter, are so blanked up?!!!

Erik
She's the best representative that Long Beach could up with? She makes us all look like a bunch of idiots.
Julie W
@BixbyKnollsResident: The only way for Laura to be replaced is if she lost to another Democrat. While I vote Republican usually, the reality is that the 37th District is a supermajority Democrat seat. Even if it is redistricted in 2012, it will likely remain a Democrat seat. As much as I would like a Republican to win - its not going to happen. A Democrat needs to run against her and beat her - its the only way to get rid of her.
Pigeon
People who continue to keep on voting for Ms. Richardson get what they ask for if not what they deserve.
CHARLIE
What's the big deal - she got 67% of approval; Let her do her job. Frankly, I'm more concerned with Obama on what he's not doing...
Quit Crying!
Leave her alone! I don't care if she cheats Long Beach companies out of money like she did by refusing to pay for her car repair or by cheating the bank on her mortgage or by cheating the American taxpayer out of money! She's part of the Inner-City Community, so leave her alone. We do things different in the "hood!"
LB Res
She was voted in because there was no other choice--the better of two evils. You can disagree with me, but that is the truth--that's why she made it.
Dave in Alamitos Beach
Well until the district is reconfigured based on either new legislation or the new census, then we're going to have a Democrat in this office. So why can't we come up with a more viable, less embarrassing candidate than Laura? When she first ran against Jenny Oropeza it wasn't a knockout, and now she only has the power of incumbancy going for her.
Bruce Alton
Let's get the ball rolling on identifying a well qualified replacement. How about Robert Garcia for 2012?
LBLover
Please everyone, a little respek for a Member of Congress. Some of you are sounding just a tad racist.
Paul
This is soooo Long Beach. As she said,"Snoop Dog" number one citizen of Long Beach, and her, of course. We have to live with this. It has not changed in many decades and will not without a party change. That is not going to happen.
Dennis
Richardson's ethical and moral compass seem to run to "what's in it for me." Her term in office and antics are an indictment of the voters who voted for her and the majority of Long Beach politicians and public workers who supported her. They don't really care about her character, as represented by her support in the last election, they just care that she has the coveted (D) next to her name and is incumbent. I am ashamed of my fellow constituents in the 37th District who have elected her to be my "representative" in Congress.
John B. Greet
There is really not a lot here to discuss. Politico reports that a "letter of resignation sent by a former staffer to Rep. Laura Richardson (D-Cali.) appears to indicate that ethics investigators are probing the Los Angeles-area Congresswoman." The "appearance of an indication" should not really have a lot of significance in the realm of factual discourse. It is great fodder for rumor and speculation. It affords detractors an opportunity to pile on and defenders an opening for numerous variations on the theme of "Yes, so what?" But unless we can confirm that another ethics probe is actually in progress, and then see the findings once it has concluded, little of constructive value is gained by bantering back and forth about it.
RW Crum
I certainly hope something comes of this. She's horrible, absolutely horrible, as a person and a Congressional representative. She needs to be taken down embarrassingly, in public, to the point where she never shows her face ever again. It's unfathomable that anyone would have voted for this disaster.
LBCityGirl
@Eagle Eye: My cat could have won an election against Star Parker, that is how we ended up with Richardson.
Chris Burnett
This woman is an embarassment to Southern California and Long Beach. She needs a strong primary challenge in 2012, when her district will be redrawn into something hopefully less gerrymandered.
Kathy Ryan
Laura Richardson got to power because she is a Democrat. There are too many who are followers, whose vote will never change. They are fed propoganda and believe it, instead of studying the person or the issues. Congress will not do anything about Laura's indiscretions and neither will the voters. Character got lost in the equation a long time ago. It would not be politically safe for Congress to do what is right, and the voters in her district only care if she fits their particular political profile.
Allison Eaton, Managing E
There is or was definitely some type of investigation, though it has thus far been impossible to confirm the federal agency that is heading it up. I know a number of Richardson's current and former staffers, and the staffer who wrote the letter and said she was interviewed by federal investigators with a lawyer present is not the only one who has been interviewed regarding the congresswoman's alleged illegal activities. The trouble in officially confirming the probe lies in the federal government's practice of neither confirming nor denying when queried. The only way to officially confirm is if and when an indictment is issued.
Steve5thDistrict
At least she supported the Health Care Bill which is more than I can say for many of the GOP members.
LuvLB
I'm with LBLover. Back off people! You don't know the facts and a one sided view doesn't serve anyone!!!
vidaurri
Actually, everybody and their grandmother is being accused of one thing or another. Bottomline..Laura votes for the issues I am concerned. If we are stuck with the Democrats, she is one of the better ones.

gg

So Sick of It
This is a hot mess. An embarrassment. WHEN WILL A LONG BEACH DEMOCRAT RUN AGAINST LAURA? 14th Floor, are you listening?? The only reason she got 68 percent of the vote is because she essentially ran unopposed. I blame our local party leadership for allowing bad elected officials to receive endorsements and with that, the near-inevitable financial support and volunteers. LB DEMS, THIS STARTS WITH YOU. Step up and do the right thing!
Jim H
Laura works hard for the voters in her district and votes the way they want in contrast to those who promise but vote the way the moneyed interests tell them to vote. I can see that upsets the riff raff here.
Wrigley Gal
I have spoken with several Democrats "in the know" who have all said they would not run against Richardson. A myriad reasons... but, basically a Dem is in with a solid following. No need to rock the boat. Unfortunately, those of us who live in the District have the misfortune of being represented by a person who is simply not fit to be in Congress. We had a few choices in the primary, but the candidates were not sufficiently vocal-- and suffered the consequences. I did not see Star Parker as a choice. Too much Bible and slavery peppered into her speeches. Too little background on the issues. I voted for neither. I think we should have the option of voting for "None of the above"-- Maybe then part of Richardson's 68% of the vote would find a voice.
Jan90813
Not surprised - It is embarassing to be represented by Ricahrdson. Does anyone think she will ever gain enough respect from her colleagues to get anything done for Long Beach? She needs to be replaced - and let's not fool ourselves, this is a Democrat majority seat. A Democrat will need to run against her.
John B. Greet
Thanks Ms. Eaton. Personally, I think controversy will always follow Congresswoman Richardson, just as it has from the moment she stepped into her first public office. I think voters in California would be wise to consider just why that might be, and, for once, vote more intelligently where she is concerned.
Rickatsea
To Steve5thDistrict who said;" At least she supported the Health Care Bill which is more than I can say for many of the GOP members." What a great reason to continually vote for anyone or anything just so they are of your party of choice. Does integrity, honesty, character, ever come to mind or do you just look at the color and the party? If anyone continually votes because of color or party they are probably what they themselves quickly call others; Narrow minded racists. Obviously an abundance (67%) here in Long Beach. We sow what we grow.

Stu C.
LBLover: I wondered how many comments would be registered on this page before someone just had to show their ignorance and mention the "r" word. I read the 15 (FIFTEEN!) comments preceding yours, and couldn't find a single one that even remotely suggested any "racism." If memory serves me, Richardson is as much white as she is black, so shelve the "tad racist" crap and deal with the fact that she is one self-serving official who just doesn't play by the same rules/ethics/morals that her constituents are expected to. By the way, respek is not recognized in the English language!
Rw Crum
@Ryan: "There are too many who are followers, whose vote will never change. They are fed propoganda and believe it, instead of studying the person or the issues."

Kinda like some people who vote no on every tax issue.
Chris
I am a Democrat, and as I posted earlier this is an embarassment for Long Beach. Truth be told, however, Richardson's sins are only by degree. I used to be a congressional reporter and press secretary, and truth be told most to some degree abuse their staff by requiring personal favors. The people who work for congressmen/women are generally young, in their 20s and 30s, and working as a congressional staff member is a way to climb the political ladder. Congressional staff and personal time tend to blend. Young staffers normally won't complain because to do so would make them pariahs and unable to get a better political job. There's a degree of prestige in working for a member of Congress, as the title defers a degree of respect. What is unfortunate is that Richardson has D-Long Beach next to her name in news accounts. More respected local Democratic officeholders won't challenge her, unless she gets indicted or involved in a sexual indiscretion, because they'd be challenging the local party leaders who are now in some degree beholden to her. And there's nothing in these allegations again her that show she's ineffective in working with local leaders in supporting projects; in other words, bringing home the bacon. Political neophytes or Republicans will run against her, but they don't have a chance unless her district is redrawn either to have her run against another congressman/woman or run in a district with more Republican voters, like including wealthier parts of Long Beach or the Palos Verdes Peninsula in her district.
LBLover
Stu C - I guess you never watched Ali G. He used the word "respek" many times. Please - keep it real.
Steve5thDistrict
Rickatsea - My point was not that she's the greatest legislator; I'm just saying that if we had elected a Republican, that person might have voted against giving us a better heath care system. Sometimes you have to vote for the lesser of two evils...
Help
By the looks of her, she should resign and take care of her health.
Debster
To Stu C: "There is so little respek in the world that they took it out of the dictionary" - Ali G
Dick
I wish that I had a better choice than Starr Parker. Let's let the events play out and hopefully have a true airing of evidence. But please, let's have better people step up.
San Pedrover
This is another reason we can't wait for redistricting. Her district is drawn to allow this kind of behavior so long as they are seen as "caring about the community".

This is NOT the LB vote - this is the Carson/Compton vote. If it were more LB, she would have lost to Oropeza in 2007.
Quit Crying!
Leave the "hood" alone! So what if she made aides work on her campaign and everyone knows that's a violation of federal law . . . she's from the "hood" so leave her alone because we do stuff different in the "hood."
fred wilson
She needs to be removed from office via a special recall or in next election, however the reality is beating her remains difficult given the registration and demographics of her district. Only a well financed and known candidate on democratic side can beat her and even with that remember she beat Oropeza who had the unions with her. Viable candidates based on ability to raise money and name id only are: Mayor Foster but I think he lives in Dana's district; Vice-Mayor Lowenthal, Councilmember Garcia - but he is probably too young and flip flops on everything; and not sure anyone else from LB on Dem elected side - what about a well - known african-american or hispanic private sector candidate that is well-financed - that is what it is going to take to beat her.
Jlai
My parents taught me long time ago that if you don't like the place where you are working, you have the free will to leave.  What kind of a person would stay on in a place if they felt abused?  Just leave.  Laura Richardson is a driven passionate advocate.  If Macias felt pressure working for her, the classy thing to do would be to leave and find another job. 
Surprise Surprise
What councilmembers aren't disgusting people? Honestly...
NorthLBDem
A Democrat should primary her. My two picks would be Alan Lowenthal or Robert Garcia. Or ANYONE!!!! But someone please run against her.
Dragonflyqueen
Puleeeze...quit w/ the 'racist' accusations....Laura Richardson was a lousy council person and is even worse as a Congress woman! People need to research who they vote for....We all need to be responsible and NOT just vote party lines ! Rep or Dem==== know what they really think, who gives them BIG money etc...Laura is all for herself and not Long Beach or any of her other constituents.....
Andy
What politician does not assume that his or her staffers will be out walking districts or working phones for their re-election? Yes, they're supposed to use vacation time to do it and, No, they're not supposed to use government facilities, mail, photo-copying or the like, but they are expected to work the campaign. Duh.
CHARLIE
Former Staffer? Sounds like sour grapes to me...
DocJohnM
Richardson like so many of her ilk have their own agenda and are not interested in the representation process of their constituents. Our founding fathers had the idea of "citizen farmers", represent for their district for the term appointed then go home. Now it's turned into a career of self interest. With JFK's famous speech "ask not what your country can do for you", now the topsy turvy world of politics is what exactly can my country do for me is the attitude. It's pathetic really and Richardson is merely one of the problems with entitlements. This administration has turned the country into a quagmire of an entitlement system.
LaVasca
Interesting how the true colors of meaness come out in people when someone is down for the count. You all sound like mad dogs fighting over the last shred of meat on a well-chewed bone. Corruption is relative after all and compared to the ugliness and hatred being perpetrated by conservative republicans today in their zeal to bring down our president, to make him fail at any cost, Laura Richardson is an absolute angel. Her 'crimes', while not being defended, are NOTHING, merely business as usual, compared to what is going on in politics at all levels today - beginning with our own Chamber of Commerce, and all the way up, including the way that RDA funds are being unethically secreted away rather surrendered to save our state. Shame on those of you who will 'throw that firt stone' - maybe you should look in the mirror first and realize that you are repelled by what you see in Richardson because you recognize it in yourselves.
Uptown Dem
Long Beach just aint right without a cheap Laura Richardson story! When you put is perspective, there's really nothing to this other than Richardson being a beast to work with. Others have been and are being investigated for much worse behavior. The truth is that every elected official in Long Beach has their staff working on campaigns. Some are even required to use vacations days or take time off payroll for the cause. Any seasoned staffer will tell you that such practices go with the territory. Only the strong can survive the rough and tumble world of brass nuckle politics. Congress is much more visceral than the LB City Council.
LBresident
LaVasca: Nice reply- its the Republican's who are at fault for this because they are so mean and hateful. I can't wait for your next post when you inform us how it was George Bush's fault that Richardson does all of this. Classic.
John B. Greet
Poster "LaVasca" exemplifies an unfortunate trend: to de-emphasize or minimize potential wrong-doing on the part of an elected official because it represents "business as usual." Or to attempt to deflect attention from possible improper acts on the part of one person because others may have committed or been accused of similar acts or worse. Neither approach serves to address the specific person or the actual allegations at hand. Rep. Richardson is apparently under investigation. This does *not* mean that she has done anything wrong. The investigation itself will reach a conclusion on that score at some point. If what she did is determined to be wrong, it will not be because some people do not like her, or because some people are picking on her, or because "corruption is relative." It will be because there exist rules of professional behavior that all of our elected officials are expected to follow and when it can be proven that they have not done so they should be held to answer for it. This standard should be applied to *all* elected officials, regardless of political persuasion or party affiliation. If some other elected official has behaved in the very same manner, then the correct response would be to bring *those* charges against *that* person as well, and not to seek to dismiss or minimize the reasonable concerns about *these* charges against *this* official.
Eagle Eye
I rest my case on LaVasca's statements.

True insight into the mind of a liberal/leftist. Even when caught red-handed, they are STILL do not take ANY personal responsibility, and instead point fingers at others in an attempt to justify wrong-doings.

I rest my case.

Eagle Eye
I rest my case on LaVasca's statements.

True insight into the mind of a liberal/leftist. Even when caught red-handed, they are STILL do not take ANY personal responsibility, and instead point fingers at others in an attempt to justify wrong-doings.

I rest my case.

Jlai
There is a big secret that everybody's afraid to talk about.  Come on! Who's going to be the honest and brave person that will tell the true story about politics including local politics?  Everyone knows that our counsel people in Long Beach past and present have depended on their staff to help with their campaigns.  I and everyone else know this first hand.  I am shocked that this would point at one Congressperson who is obviously being blasted by al of her enemies.  Notice that there are no open letters from any local politicians or their staff members.  Do we really want to do an investigation on whether any of them have had their staff help them with a personal issue or a campaign?  The hypocrisy is unbelievable here.  The political lies and false shock is disgusting.  The letter writer against the Congressperson obviously started this backstabbing scandal for personal reasons.  Anyone who can't see what's really going on here truly does not understand either Macias's background or politics in general.    
Who will run
Will a good Democrat run against this crazy lady already?! Robert Garcia, Alan Lowenthal, Gerrie Schipske... It's time for someone to face off against Richardson. I'd phone bank 50 hours for you, whoever you are!
Integrity
I'm sure she is not the only public official to use tax payer money, or use favors for her benefit. But I'm also sure she is not the only colored person held to a higher standard than her non colored counterparts, who often do the same without being questioned.
Stu C.
Integrity: Answer a very simple question, not just for me, but for EVERYONE who is offended by this constant reference to race! If a person has a black father and a white mother who divorce...and the child, at the tender age of two, is raised by the white mother, what "color" is this child? You may want to bone up on your knowledge of Richardson's family history before you spout off about her "colored" background. Please stop showing bias, and leave race out of this. In my opinion, she is just as much white as she is black, and regardless of her racial origin, she just doesn't seem to play by the rules that the rest of us adhere to, whether those rules include home loan defaults, legal residency during her council years, or even possibly using her staff for her personal campaigns.
Spencer Carey
To all of you who are commenting on "how bad" Angel Macias, or that she is being sour about things, you obviously don't know her, or don't know what was going on. I personally know and love Angel Macias. She is like another mom to me and a great mentor. I work with her with California Families in Focus, the non-profit organization she founded. When I first joined her program, When I was young and just wanted the hours for school. After the first couple times I volunteered with her I was amazed at the different events and programs she produces and coordinates. It made me a different person and my mentality of volunteering changed overall. After that I wasn't volunteering just for the hours, I was volunteering for the cause and to make a difference not only with one event but with many Long Beach events. I have been on the Youth Advisory Committee for just over 6 years now, and now I am a better person. If it wasn't for her, I probably would not have gotten into the college of my choice. I have decent grades which makes it hard for someone like myself to get into a four year college, but since I have over 1000 hours, I got into the college of my dreams. Not only has the community of Long Beach seen our work, but we have been in a couple newspapers and magazines about how much of a difference we have made.Volunteering has made it possible for me to recive awards from many elected official. Angel Macias has taught myself and the rest of the youth that are part of the programs about dignity, respect and that the greatest gift you could give any one is your volunteer time. This has made us who we are today. I will always be ready for an event or a volunteering opportunity for her. Thousands of people know and love her, most youth think of her like their own mom. When I was younger, my mom always told me, "don't judge a book by it's cover", this is the same about judging Angel Macias. Until you know her and the story of her personal struggles you will realize how far she has come and what she has done for the Long Beach Community! If you used your real names and not hide behind fake names, you would not be saying these obserd comments about her. I just wanted you all know how amazing this woman is. Helping the community is now my first priority. It is a passion that we all share at Califronia Families in Focus.
Spencer Carey
To all of you who are commenting on "how bad" Angel Macias, or that she is being sour about things, you obviously don't know her, or don't know what was going on. I personally know and love Angel Macias. She is like another mom to me and a great mentor. I work with her with California Families in Focus, the non-profit organization she founded. When I first joined her program, When I was young and just wanted the hours for school. After the first couple times I volunteered with her I was amazed at the different events and programs she produces and coordinates. It made me a different person and my mentality of volunteering changed overall. After that I wasn't volunteering just for the hours, I was volunteering for the cause and to make a difference not only with one event but with many Long Beach events. I have been on the Youth Advisory Committee for just over 6 years now, and now I am a better person. If it wasn't for her, I probably would not have gotten into the college of my choice. I have decent grades which makes it hard for someone like myself to get into a four year college, but since I have over 1000 hours, I got into the college of my dreams. Not only has the community of Long Beach seen our work, but we have been in a couple newspapers and magazines about how much of a difference we have made.Volunteering has made it possible for me to recive awards from many elected official. Angel Macias has taught myself and the rest of the youth that are part of the programs about dignity, respect and that the greatest gift you could give any one is your volunteer time. This has made us who we are today. I will always be ready for an event or a volunteering opportunity for her. Thousands of people know and love her, most youth think of her like their own mom. When I was younger, my mom always told me, "don't judge a book by it's cover", this is the same about judging Angel Macias. Until you know her and the story of her personal struggles you will realize how far she has come and what she has done for the Long Beach Community! If you used your real names and not hide behind fake names, you would not be saying these obserd comments about her. I just wanted you all know how amazing this woman is. Helping the community is now my first priority. It is a passion that we all share at Califronia Families in Focus.

Popular Now

See more

New in the Marketplace

See more