Wednesday, February 8, 2012

People versus Parking
by Brian Ulaszewski | Design In Place | 01.09.12 | 
| Text Size:
+



9:30am |
A few years ago my automobile was towed to the municipal yard for impound after I had received a series of street-sweeping-related parking tickets. From then on, except for rare occasions when I had to drive to a meeting, I left my car at the office, since I had been walking to work most of time, anyway.

While sitting at my desk one day I received a call from the parking management for the office building where I work. After confirming the license plate number, make, and model of my car they asked me, “You do know that you are not allowed
ADVERTISEMENT
to park your car overnight in the structure?” “Why not?” I inquired. “The garage is empty every night. How about I stop parking overnight when it starts impacting your capacity?” My office pays monthly rent to store our cars in the garage; I saw little difference in parking overnight versus during work hours, especially so when it was empty. After continuing the battle between logic and their rules, they said that a supervisor would call back. Though the supervisor never called, it became my entrance into the war on parking.

This campaign is not against parking itself, but the relentless zombie horde of inflexible parking regulations dictating one-size-fits-all solutions and the culture of convenience, where a parking stall must be in front of every desired destination. To this day the unstoppable combination of the two has wasted resources, erased built history, and caused the loss of vibrancy in residential neighborhoods and commercial districts. According to a 2007 Federal Department of Transportation study, there are over 250 million registered private automobiles in the United States, but studies by various academics and government agencies estimate that there are as many as 2 billion parking stalls in the United States.

A recent New York Times article estimated that up to a third of American cities are paved for parking lots. During a lecture about parking in downtown commercial districts, Ventura’s City Manager Rick Cole poignantly stated that, “With such a surplus of available parking, a car will never go homeless.” The struggle is for smarter parking guidelines and our collective willingness to walk a block or two from our car to our destination. Together these provide greater flexibility to create places for people, not cars.

The article goes onto describe a familiar history, as Pensacola, Florida, tore down its urban fabric of historic structures in the downtown to create convenient parking lots in an effort to compete with shopping malls emerging in the suburbs. Instead, the vast empty fields of parking sucked the remaining life from the downtown — just as it has in Long Beach. Today, one must walk past blocks of near empty parking lots and structures between the core of Downtown Long Beach and surrounding neighborhoods.

Following the lead of communities like Portland, San Diego, and Seattle, Long Beach seeks to recapture these asphalt deserts for people with the adoption of the Downtown Plan. Current zoning standards have resulted in large developments whose core design principle was most often based around parking provisions. Walking along Seaside Way past thousands of empty parking stalls in the Aqua Towers, Harbor View apartments, and Pike makes one wonder how much nicer the experience would have been if priorities were slightly different.

The new zoning documents revise parking standards to provide greater flexibility for infill development and adaptive reuse of existing structures, making smaller, context-sensitive projects much more feasible. Instead of seeing blocks of parking garages like those on First Street, new development would be required to line the sidewalk with positive uses like shops, lobbies, and residential stoops. Despite the limitations of any zoning document (as I wrote about here), there could be a significant rebalancing of priorities to create a more vibrant downtown.

Long Beach is also engaging an insurgent campaign against the vast amounts of public domain used for storing cars. Community organizations, individuals, and even the mischievous city staffer participate in the global, one-day event Park(ing) Day, as temporary parks were installed across the city in parking stalls. This past year saw a dozen mini-parks established across the city with book fares, outdoor dining, concerts, and public outreach occupying spaces once meant only for cars.

Some of these are becoming more permanent as Long Beach experiments with the parklet phenomenon, as three temporary sidewalk plazas are being built along Fourth Street in Retro Row and the East Village. Local favorite restaurants Berlin Cafe , Number Nine Noodles, and Lola’s Mexican Cuisine will construct wooden decks that expand their outdoor dining without impeding pedestrian traffic on these narrow sidewalks. While losing fewer than a half-dozen (total) of their most convenient parking stalls, the business-owners and local associations have deemed the benefit to their respective business and overall pedestrian experience well worth the trade.

Not all are zero-sum equations of parking versus people, as is evident from the new affordable-housing development Pine Crest in Central Long Beach. This partnership between the City of Long Beach and Jamboree Housing Company combines three multi-family properties to create a single community, rehabilitating the existing structures and improving the overall site. Removing existing driveways, converting an existing apartment back into a garage (a previously illegal unit conversion), and better use of land will net more parking for the neighborhood, while increasing available open space for new residents ten-fold.

The march towards balancing the priorities of parking and people will require flexibility from our regulation and culture. People are willing to walk a few blocks on Second Street in Belmont Shore from car to destination(s), while ever more of us are willing to ride our bikes or public transit. Despite the commercial district having far fewer parking stalls than required by zoning code, the Belmont Shore area is successful because of the experience. Instead of walking past parking lots, shoppers and diners stroll past shops and sidewalk dining filled with people.

Whether it’s through regulations like the Downtown Plan or insurgent action like Park(ing) Day and parklets, the tide can be turned so that we are parking smarter and creating more vibrant places.





Comments
Click Here to Join the Discussion on this Story

20 Comments so far.
Bill Orton
The city's cite-&-tow operation is unduly aggressive that hurts the poor and working class. Someone living paycheck-to-paycheck who gets a citation often must time the payment with their next check, or, if stretched, the one after that, meaning that by the time they're able to pay, the cost of the ticket has doubled. The use of a tow operation, as opposed to booting of vehicle, places further burden, as someone who could not pay the cost of tickets is highly unlikely to be able to spring into action to rescue a car immediately, guaranteeing a tow-and-storage cost that could easily exceed $500. I would suggest a lengthening to at least 30 days on the doubling of fines (45 or 60, better still), and the use of a boot after the 5th citation. If the city believes that it runs a "profit" on the street sweeping program because of these revenues, then they are balancing their budget on the backs of the poor and working class.

Jim Lewis
True - there's more space for cars than people . . . including the homeless.

Mike Ruehle
If you want to see UNUSED ASPHALT DESERTS, check out the huge parking lots on the beach that are almost ALWAYS empty. These lots produce very little parking revenue.

Numerous suggestions have been offered to improve their utilization and relieve the parking strain of the beach communities. ALL SUGGESTIONS were shot down.

The city is more interested in reserving the beach parking lots for their special events department to periodically rent out to the movie companies. Meanwhile, the beach lots are an unused resource that require money to maintain.

LBLover
A little piece of me dies inside every time I find myself typing "I agree with Ruehle", but he does make a good point - We have vast parking at the beaches, but no one wants to go to a beach with disgusting water, dirty sand, and NO SURF.

TEAR DOWN THE BREAKWATER, and those problems will resolve themselves!

KenK
This is a money-making operation. The city reaps its pieces of silver through ticketing, towing and storage; but there are private organizations that make a lot of money on it too.

A case in point: In Naples, on 2nd Street, there is a Rite-Aid drug store. Next to it is a small strip mall parking lot serving the Rite Aid and some small businesses.

Nearby, on 2nd Street, are several small restaurants.

Street parking is limited here. So it is an obvious alternative to use this small lot. Rite Aid closes at 10 PM. The other stores close well before that --- usually at 6 PM.

The owner of the property has a contract with an unscruplous towing company that the LBPD has had many complaints about. It is reasonable to think that, on a Friday or Saturday night, parking is needed for the restaurants.

While the lot is "posted" (not well), there is no one using those slots for the stores at this time of the evening. Logically, it hurts no one but the nearby restaurants if cars cannot park there.

On weekends, there is often a fleet of tow trucks waiting outside the parking lot for 10 PM to come. Then ZIP! any car parked in the lot is towed. As a result, if you go to dinner at 8 PM and leave the restaurant at 10:10 PM, don't expect to find your car.

It costs over $325 to get your car back --- payable to the towing company. I don't know for a fact, but the aggressiveness of this company suggests that somebody else (the property owner?) is getting a cut of this.

This happened to us. We sued in Small Claims Court --- and won. It was, however, one royal pain the in backside to cope with these people.

The hypocrisy is that, you can park there and go to lunch at a nearby restaurant and nobody will bother you. This DOES affect the strip mall's business. God forbid that you should be there after 10 PM --- when there is no possiblity of hurting their business.


Dave in Alamitos Beach
Since the comments seem to be more about street parking and towing, I'll add that I think the parking lot owners would make more money if they just rented out their lots after they close up for business. I suppose it could either be nightly or monthly, depending on their choice. It would surely be more lucrative for the lot owners than just the kickbacks they get from the towing companies, right? And this whole issue points up the problem that the parking is in places people don't want to go, and vice versa. I have never seen a city throw away more of its beautiful area and give it to empty parking lots. Parking spaces have the great views in Long Beach, not the people.

Hoofin it
Try parking your vehicle in that lovely parking structure to go visit the Aquarium. It's herrendous fees to park in it eliminated my desire to park there first of all, and second, with it I lost my desire see the Aquarium. Another customer for the Aquarium driven away by the manipulative city leaders that doing the best they can to drive businesses and law abiding people away.

criss
now had you been cited for driving without a license you would have been home free - no towing, no impounding...

JoeW
Brian and prior commenters illustrate two different sorts of LB parking perversity sponsored by City Hall and some others. First, some parking is built so as to degrade the very attractions that would motivate your parking near them, and then - once built - the parking isn’t reliably available for use after all. Last month I was subjected to two examples of the latter perversity. Besides overpricing itself, Civic Center garage has now automated its pay mechanism so that - after hours at least - the exit gate is closed without any evident human attendant to enable exit in case of payment glitches - which easily happen because payment machine instructions are in part inscrutable and in part don't work. As a result (unwilling to face a charge of vandalizing public property by ramming thru the exit gate), I was almost forced to abandon my car overnight there, miles from home. A similar quandary nearly recurred in one of the new LGB airport parking structures - again, overpriced and under-humanized. I plan never again to park in either of these places.

Fed Up In Downtown
The parking at Shoreline West (or whatever it's called) is ridiculous. The part where Pine Ave Pier is at, with Chili's, Outback Steakhouse, Gladstone's, etc...

Sometimes it's self-park for $8 with NO VALIDATION (i.e. RIPOFF) and at certain times it's VALET ONLY for god knows what... this is just ridiculous and I just take my business to the Lakewood area restaurants where the parking is free.

Dismayed
Parklets? Seriously? On 4th street? With all the exhaust? Outdoor sidewalk seating really only works with really wide sidewalks. Thanks but no.

tobias
the parklet is unsafe & unsanitary car crash waiting to happen while the author is a rebel anarchist who misunderstands development wanting zoning and building codes abolished so naive history dictates what is destined to occur again i do not agree.

The Man
Hey Brian,

This was a great read for me. Parking Downtown is no joke. Someone commented on the parking situation downtown near Mai Tai Bar and the Aquarium. Fees are high and it's a hassle...

Keep this series going... por favor.

Spike N LB
Blah blah blah, and of course you would be the first person screaming at the parking management office if/when you car is stolen or vandalized because you left it in the same space for weeks. That and/or writing another whiny column questioning why parking management didn't question a car that was parked for weeks in the same space that turns out to have the body of a missing child, dead in the trunk.

And why is that? Because it is ALWAYS about you.

Dismayed
A Spike N Lb- Besides a place to park I have to worry about cars being stolen, vandalized or used to hide the dead bodies of missing children now? Way to go hijacking an issue in order to voice your distaste for the writer of the article...

Agree
Agree with LBLover! Take down the breakwater and those parking lots will fill up.


Stop crying
Start charging with meters in the residential areas. Everyone that ownes a car should have to pay to leave it someplace. No matter were or how long. It's time car owners own up. I have to pay to park and so should the rest of you:)

Alternative Transit Pleas
If we really made clear the cost of cars - oil, foreign wars, AND including parking spaces - then I bet a lot more people would walk, bike, demand better bus service and rail, etc. We subsidize the car and pretend it is a 'free' good but in reality individualized transport - and the 'freedom' to leave our property wherever we want, even at $8 or $20 which is probably less than the cost to the public - is a heavily state-subsidized good. Bring on the parklets!

PDQ
I stopped going downtown. The only thing to do is eat and then leave. There's no real shopping unless you want to buy T-shirts and underwear at Walmart.

The Aquarium structure sits empty because people won't pay $8 in advance (no validation allowed) in order to go to Bubba Gump's, Mai Tai Bar, etc. V20 was smart to pull out when they did.

And don't even get me started on what the "bike lanes" on Broadway and on 3rd have done to decimate downtown businesses. What they've done is make it easier to go elsewhere - ANYWHERE else.

The fact of the matter is, downtown residents can't sustain all the businesses in downtown LB by themselves and neither can the out of towners who sporadically come in for a day or two to attend a convention. If you want bustling restaurants and decent shopping downtown after 5:00 pm, you're going to have to pull in people who live outside downtown and make downtown LB a destination.

DLBA and the city need to pull their collective heads out of their hind ends or downtown will remain a ghost town.

Sander
I had two very different experiences in my earlier days. I grew up in Park Estates. Every house has a driveway and parking garage, plus ample street parking. Street sweeping times are typically late morning or early afternoon.

When I moved to an apartment just West of Cherry on 4th Street, street sweeping was at 6 AM. I was working a night shift back then, and would almost always get home after midnight. On street sweeping nights I'd often have to park a quarter to half a mile away, and walk through some extremely sketchy areas to get home.

So, in areas with very high density, street sweeping seemed intentionally scheduled to generate citations, and in affluent low density areas, the opposite.

This seems to indicate, yet again, that the City is not serving the needs of its residents. Ideally, the system should be designed to generate as few tickets as possible.

The reasoning for the early schedule on 4th Street is that it is zoned as commercial. The handful of business owners take precedence over the hundreds or thousands of residents.

Design In Place
Brian Ulaszewski searches for sense of place in the built environment and the social architecture that is created through it. He will investigate the urban context of Long Beach and its wider relation to global, regional and local change.

Brian Ulaszewski practices architecture, planning and urban design in Long Beach, projects ranging in size and scope from city master planning to small loft conversions. He has a background in architecture, historic preservation, transportation and land-use planning. Brian is a member of the Long Beach Design Forum and a board member of the Gateway Cities Affordable Housing Coalition. (photo credit: Russ Roca)

Brian's Community

Bikestation Long Beach
Long Beach Affordable Housing Coalition
Brian's Archives

January, 2012

01.09.12 People versus Parking

December, 2011

12.20.11 A Better Alley

Show All Archives


About Us | Contact Us | Policies