Public's Help Sought in Shooting Investigation
Beaches West of Belmont Pier Closed to Sewage Spill
- Beaches West of Belmont Pier Closed to Sewage Spill
- Mayor Meets with LGBT Community
- Traffic Fatality in North Long Beach
- Public Meeting on Orizaba Park to Be Held
- L.A. County's Analysis of Brown's Budget Revision to be Released
- Officials Kick-Off Middle Harbor Moderization Project
- Governor: More Furloughs, More Cuts to Health & Welfare Programs
- CSULB Joins Youth Journalists to Cover Marginalized Long Beach
- Long Beach Schools Ranks Amongst the Best State- and Nationwide
- LBPD Officer Charged with 39 Sex Crimes with 13 Victims
- City Employee Embezzles Quarter-Million Dollars
Long Beach Passes Budget With Cuts To Police & Fire

11:00am Wednesday | The Long Beach City Council last night approved a budget that features the loss of dozens of Police positions as well as rolling brownouts at Fire stations across the city, in order to balance an $18.5 million deficit.
The City is still attempting to negotiate with several employee unions to either forego scheduled pay raises or contribute more to their pensions plans so the City will not shoulder that financial responsibility, but on Tuesday the Council took action based on the assumption that those discussions will not bear fruit.
Long Beach Mayor Bob Foster said that union reform needs to happen immediately, or else the future outlook is very bleak.
"If anybody thinks it's going to be better next year, good luck to you," he said. "It's not."
Long Beach will lose about 18 Fire Department positions and also experience rolling brownouts at several fire stations across the city. Hours will be reduced and one fire truck will be removed from the Department fleet. Firefighters Association President Rich Brandt told City officials that the brownouts strategy is "like Russian roulette" because the station closures will bounce around the city and affect all Council districts. He also said that San Diego is currently experiencing brownouts and is suffering because of it.
On the Police Department side, more than 60 positions are estimated to be lost under the approved budget, with about one dozen saved because Police Chief Jim McDonnell agreed to support the elimination if the Academy program for the next year. "We can't in good faith run an academy knowing that the potential for layoffs is still there," he said, noting that he hopes to reopen the academy next year.
*
8:30pm Tuesday | During Tuesday night's regular City Council meeting, Mayor Bob Foster noted that the Council directed City Manager Pat West to initiate a "meet and confer process" with the International Association of Machinists (IAM), the only City employee union that has been unreceptive to some kind of agreement to relinquish pay raises or apply said raises to their pension costs.
In order to meet targeted budget goals, Foster said, West should discuss with the IAM the potential of instituting not only layoffs but also furlough days. Foster said the decision was unanimous among the City Councilmembers.
Mayor Foster said this was the only news of note to emerge from the the earlier closed session during which West provided the City Council with an update on City employee negotiations.
During public comment to begin the City Council meeting, one person who identified himself as a rank-and-file member of the IAM said that his group has given enough and the City should not ask for any more from the union. Mayor Foster replied by calling his speech "remarkably irresponsible testimony."
The Mayor said that he has been supportive of the union in the past. "But in this case," he said, "The problems are so steep and so bad that if we don't address them now it will get much worse."
Foster thanked several other City employee unions that have been receptive to negotiations as Long Beach attempts to balance a budget with an $18.5 million deficit. After several weeks of reports that the Police Officers Association would not participate in any plans to delay or forego scheduled pay raises, Mayor Foster said that he had a "great and good, professional conversation" with POA President Steve James over the weekend. While no agreement has been made with the POA, which represents the largest portion of expenditures among City employee unions, Foster said that the two now agree on the problems at hand and he cited this as a major breakthrough in conducting future negotiations.
*
4:00pm Tuesday | Opening a public Budget Hearing this afternoon, Mayor Bob Foster said that he is "disappointed" in some City employee groups that have refused to negotiate plans that would ease both the immediate and long term financial burden on cash-strapped Long Beach.
"There are some groups that have provided substantial disappointment in terms of their conduct," Mayor Foster said. "What needs to get fixed at the top of the list are public pensions."
The City has been engaged in important negotiations with all City employee groups to possibly forego scheduled raises or contribute more to their own pensions plans, as Long Beach seeks to balance an $18.5 million deficit in the budget that must soon be finalized.
Several employee groups agreed to concessions, Foster said, while the Fire and Police Department unions have shown they are willing to discuss some kind of agreement. However, the Mayor expressed strong disappointment with the International Association of Machinists.
"In terms of the Machinists, I've been very disappointed because they've just said no," Mayor Foster said, nothing that the union will accept a 4-percent pay raise this year, as scheduled.
"I think that's clearly inappropriate and out of line."
Foster said that without continued help from City employees, there will be "a future of layoffs, program elimination and/or substantial salary reductions because there's no other way to fix this."
In a closed session beginning at 4:30pm, the City Council will hear updates on vital union negotiations. The regular weekly Council meeting will begin at 5:00pm.
This article will be updated as the Long Beach City Council progresses with its Budget Hearing and scheduled City Council meeting this evening.
Tour of Historic Homes of Long Beach
Ways to Support St. Mary Medical Center C.A.R.E. Program
Limited Engagement at the Art Theatre: 'Marley' — Travelogue of a Majestic Life
Center Long Beach & Councilmember Garcia to Host Pre-Pride Workout
Second+PCH Project (Again) Possibly Back (Again)
Long Beach Hosting ACT Expo to Help Facilitate Ever Cleaner Transportation
Community Hospital Long Beach Marks 1st Anniversary with MemorialCare
East Village Scores DLBA Grant
LBCC Scholar Honored at Harvard
A Sporting Tour with LBSU -- From Far Away to Back Home
This Week In LBSU Athletics, May 14
Softballers, Sodas, Subs, and Syracuse on the Menu for LBSU





Union members who want their representatives to be less rigid need to get together and confront the union's leadership.
Unions are what have killed this country!
Fire all the City Union Employees and Hire workers as "at will employees" no health ot pension, then we can do something good here.
Check your FACTS DUDE!
I think your comments demonstrate what a tough job it is to negotiate with your union. Your "reserve money in one account with Lehman Brothers" is factually incorrect on two counts.
I do appreciate your point that you want a fair wage for honest work and that you and your colleagues aren't to blame for the world turning on it's head .... But it's not my responsible home buying decisions nor frugal spending habits that ruined our home's value. But my family still has to pay for it.
Having said that, I do; however, believe in the FACT that labor unions are ultimately corrupt and have no place in US businesses, or the United States of America for matter. Stalinist Russia, sure. A Free Democracy, hell no (especially when the mantra is "work less, paid more").
Question: In the past three years, since the recession/depression started picking up speed, how much have (1) City Officials, and (2) City Workers been given promotions?
On a Federal side, both the House and Senate gave themselves a 20% pay increase. Wondering if that's the case on a local civic level -
Instead of cutting positions, I would recommend reducing hourly wages to 2007 levels â€' when the rest of the voting public stopped earning pay increases.
I would also recommend firing those "tenured" resources that can't manage their budgets appropriately. I'm also for the stripping of pensions for those resources that have helped drive LB into an $18.5B deficit. They should pay for the short fall. The local government should not sacrifice the public safety & well being.
"Live Better (off the backs of others), Work Union (someone else will pay your way)"
munner413
You people are so brainwashed by corporate propaganda! Wake up! The rich elite have turned the working people against each other. City employees got pension increases IN STEAD of wage increases to which they were legally entitled. They've given up much to help the city. Still they barely scrape by. Wake up and stop blaming each other! The real villains have four houses because they took yours!
The savings look even worse when you remove all of the positions in the Water and Harbor because you are left with even fewer positions affecting the general fund. The Police and Fire are draining the majority of the money. Even the pay of the management compared to the worker bees is unbalanced.
Competition is getting fierce and if we lose our talented staff due to City raids on the Harbor it will only hurt the City in the long run. The tenants of the Harbor pay a premium price to be here and expect excellent service. The Pay of the City is the lowest around and we accepted the position anyway because of the benefits. Now you are asking us to essentially take a pay cut by increasing our income and taxes while we pay more into our pension. I don't see this as helping the City as a whole. You will only have talented people leave as soon as an opportunity arises and new unproductive people desperate to take the lower pay take over.
I am all for new employees getting a new pension deal but existing employees made the choice to accept the City's low pay and better pension when they took the job. Even then it doesn't make up for what I can get in private. Why not take away the City's contribution to Social Security? That can't be cheap and is excessive.
you'ld "gladly accept 4% into pers and pension reform for future hires,"
Nice of you to give up stuff for future hires. How about rolling back pensions for city employees to that of similar jobs in the private sector - and while we are at it, how about staffing city jobs like a private sector business would? I say cut, cut, cut. Eliminate alll the waste in city hall, cut every department by 25 percent (except police and fire) and rent out the excess space in city hall
Every councilperson who signed a secret document of support in trade for union money and walkers, during elections sold some of their character that should go to the citizens,and not millionare cops and fire that, for the most part, don't even live here. Shame on them all. It is obvious that this cannot go on.
Ronald Regan fired all of the air controlers. We need to do that to police and fire and hire those who will be happy to work for half the pay and benefits. We could hire enough cops to have, "an armed camp" as Mayor Bob warned. He left out that they would be our arms and not the criminal element that Bob and the Council seem content to put and leave in our neighborhoods.
"At Least We're Not Bell"
It is Not Rocket Science Folks.
The corrupt Dims now represent the "haves" -- the unionized "civil servants" who make more than twice what their private counterparts earn for the same work. According to the Cato Institute, using June 2009 data from the U.S. Bureau of
Labor Statistics, total compensation for state and local workers was $39.66 per hour compared to $27.42 for the private sector -- an astonishing 44% more.
In Long Beach, 574 city employees are members of the $100,000 club, earning over $100,000 per year in salary alone, not counting their massive health care and pension benefits.
More than 20% of LB City Employees have a base salary in excess of $90,000!
Guess who the unions think are the "robber barons" against whom they need the protection of collective bargaining? Why it's YOU the taxpayer.
http://www.lbbj.com/manage/uploads/lbbj_pdfs/Club_2010.pdf