|
||||
Exclusive: New Breakwater Study (Available For Download!) by Ryan ZumMallen | Archive | 02.12.09 |
+ ![]() “I grew up on this beach,” says Bud Johnson, a retired engineer and Long Beach native who has never strayed far from the ocean. “This beach was my life, and it kept me out of trouble.” So Johnson had no problem putting himself through the trouble of improving that very beach, producing a massive breakwater study last year that recommended created two 1800-foot gaps in the structure that would allow pollution to be carried out to sea. Johnson worked for months to get the study into the right hands, and eventually found the offices of City Councilmembers, Port of Long Beach officials and the Parks & Recreation Department. It eventually was passed onto the engineering firm Moffatt , which is in the process of conducting its own official study and will recommend action to the City within the next few months, relying on some parts of Johnson’s research. But Johnson didn’t rest on his laurels for long, immediately going back to work on the report. Last Tuesday, he finally completed the new 12-page study, and today we have it available for you to download and examine. Click on this link to download Johnson's newest breakwater study. After further examining his first report, Johnson realized that making two 1800-foot gaps in the breakwater was probably not necessary. After looking at flow and circulation charts, he realized that one 1800-foot gap would be more effective and half as costly. “There is no flow pattern indicating that a second gap would help,” he explains. Removing about 15 feet of the rocky structure below water level would allow enough water flow to exit the harbor and drift out to sea, helping to clean up Long Beach’s notoriously toxic waters. It likely will not bring waves to the quiet shores, but will certainly create a better opportunity to ease pollution as the muck-flow known as the L.A. River will exit out to the ocean. Johnson’s other idea has just as much to do with tourism as the environment. In his studies, he noticed a natural sandbar had been built along the breakwater, creating an underwater habitat for wildlife of all kinds. Why not, he thought, turn the area into a recreational diving spot and promote it? “Mother nature is building the sandbar for us,” he says. “We could be known not as a surfing attraction but as a diving paradise.” He recommends creating a “Restricted Water Area” lined with buoys to keep ships away. The area is ripe for natural kelp beds that divers thrive on, and Johnson believes that if correctly handled, the sandbar could become a hot spot for divers. But it is the breakwater gap that will turn the most heads. It’s referred to in the report as “Johnson’s Gate,” although he pokes fun at himself by saying that it may one day be called “Johnson’s Folly.” Zing! In truth, though, he’s completely confident that the ideas in his report are useful, cost-effective, and plausible. “I can’t see negatives on this thing, only positives,” he says, welcoming any feedback or criticism that will help improve his ideas. “I’m not going to give up on this. If it goes wrong, there’s a reason. And I’ll work on it.” The plan will certainly require an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), and Johnson estimates cost to be around about $10-12 million. That includes all costs, he says, which will be about 60% permits and paperwork, and 40% actual construction. Of course, there’s also the Federal Government (who own the breakwater) and Army Corps of Engineers (who built the breakwater) to deal with, but for now the study just needs to find the right people. It’s a lot of work and a long process, but Johnson now has the connections and the ear of the right people to get his new study into good hands. With Moffat & Nichol preparing their recommendations for action to the City, we’ll soon see where the future is headed for that pile of rocks off our coast. And Bud Johnson will be waiting and watching, eager to have his work included. “For me, this is my chance to make a difference, that’s all,” he says. “Yeah, it won’t create any waves. But we can sure make it better, and I’m just trying to give back what it gave to me.” By Ryan ZumMallen, Managing Editor
Comments
Click Here to Join the Discussion on this Story
15 Comments so far.
Pam of Belmont Heights How wonderful if this plan succeeds! If I want to surf, I can just go to Bolsa Chica, but to be able to dive in Long Beach would be fabulous! What a huge draw for tourists and for divers in SoCal! Then we won't have to go to Catalina or the Channel Islands, but everyone can then enjoy diving and spend money right here at home! I am keeping my fingers crossed. Dave in Alamitos Beach Oh, this plan just breaks my heart. My fear is that this will be the maximum that will occur, i.e. Bud's Gap. What I really, really hope for is that the maximum will occur, i.e. the entire breakwater comes down. Not to disparage Bud, because this is great reading, but pollution is only part of the problem. The other problem is there are no waves. Is there any chance that Bud has the time or inclination to do a full study on the teardown of the Breakwater? He could probably beat Moffat & Nichol at this point and we could still name something after him! Charlie GO for it, Bud, you've certainly earned it! Andrew Mr. Johnson, tear down this wall! Johnson SMASH! Pat in Bixby Hill Diving is a nice recreational activity, but wouldn't draw nearly the amount of tourists as having waves back on the coast in L. B. I've lived in L.B. for 55 yrs. now and it's so sad that growing up in a city with the word "Beach" in it, that I never wanted to go to the beach in Long Beach for the day. We went where the waves were. Seal Beach, Bolsa Chica, Huntington, or Newport. (My adult kids did the same thing). The waves are truly our city's golden ticket. Always has been, always will be. I do give Mr. Johnson credit for all of the work he has done, and it would be so wonderful to have our waters clean again. Paul Bring the waves back, get rid of the "urban edge" that people have to live with, and there you have it. A well to do and thriving California Beach City, not an urban nightmare that trashes the hopes of investors and taxpayers. Judy C. Dear Mr. Johnson, I would like to address a concern I have in regards to your tourism suggestion. You are correct, Mother Nature did build a sandbar, and indeed it created an underwater habitat for wildlife. I don't think she built it to become a "diving paradise for people." My concern is that a "diving paradise" (and everything that goes with it) will create a stressful environment for all the creatures living, above, on and below the breakwater. There are times when the human animal simply needs to respect, good, ole Mother Nature and leave her plan alone! I hope to hear from you in regards to this Mr. Johnson and thank you. Don Bogart Instead of taking Long Beach’s shoreline back to the 1930’s, we should keep the breakwater and make it the backbone of two brand new parallel beaches capable of ushering Long Beach into the 21st Century. One beach would be on the ocean side of the breakwater with surf and vistas of Catalina. The other beach would be located on the breakwater city side with calm water and views to the mountains. Between the beaches, the space would be up to us. It could be a couple blocks wide with plenty of new land for development and commerce: New homes, new businesses, a new community. How would we get there? A causeway or tunnel extending from South Harbor Scenic Drive. Maybe sometime we’d even want to extend the two ends of this new land. One end could go to Pier J and the other end could curve around to the west bank of the San Gabriel River. This planned enclosure of Long Beach Harbor could include tidal powered electrical generators and gates for shipping. Residents in Belmont Shore and Naples could be made secure from storm and the 2 to 3 meters of sea level rise predicted from global warming. The Los Angeles River could be redirected away from Long Beach. Leveling the breakwater would thwart true opportunity. Tearing down the breakwater will only take us back to where we were. With the breakwater, we can take Long Beach to its future. Bob First, who will pay for it. I don't see it happening in my lifetime. Lets not waste any more money on folly. Cindy Crawford What a plan with no waves? We need waves too! Not only for our recreation but to bring people back to our beaches--$$$ travel & tourism. Nobody wants to visit a beach with no waves...they will all keep going to Huntington instead. Please Bud, rethink this no wave plan. lbresident I would love to have waves. But I am a pragmatist. There are too many people that will fight that. However, this plan could work because it wouldn't bring the objection of the Peninsula residents (at least not the rational ones). And there are plenty of beaches that are popular and don't have waves. Malibu comes to mind. Again, waves would be great. And if we can find a way without hurting homes let's do it. But don't underestimate what clean water would do for our coastline, tourism, and most importantly quality of life for existing residents. Dave in Alamitos Beach Dan Bogart, that's the worst idea I've ever heard. Or maybe it's a joke? If so, don't give our crazy City Council any more ideas! As for the poor scared Peninsula residents, there will be many, many, many big rocks available for them to build their own beach protection if they want it. Kate K I read your good article on the Breakwater, Bud Johnson's report and the many posts. I did agree with Judy's, of course, and after some thought, I felt that, if after a study the plan were approved, no homes on the peninsula affected and his mitigation put into effect, an unpolluted environment must come before anything else. Waves would be wonderful, but our oceans are in dire trouble, and we've spoiled ourselves for too long. BW > "Don Bogart said: ... we should keep the breakwater and make it the backbone of two brand new parallel beaches" Now There's a man with a vision. Bud J. Judy C.said, "Mother nature did build a sandbar and indeed created an underwater habitat for wildlife." I agree with your concerns about creating a stressful environment for wildlife in the breakwater area. With regard to my Breakwater study, it would be unwise to allow diving in the "Restricted Area" where the Breakwater rocks are removed. Water conditions caused by ocean swells could result in unsafe diving conditions. Creation of diving and/or surfing activities would involve another study,for a other time. The only purpose of my study is to improve water quality along the beachfront,for local residents and visitors, including a habitat area for resident wildlife at the Breakwater. Thanks again for taking the time to respond to my study and your concerns about wildlife issues.
Archive
LBPOST.com Managing Editor Ryan ZumMallen keeps up on all the current and breaking Long Beach news.
Ryan ZumMallen has served as the managing editor of the LBPOST.com since 2007. He graduated from CSULB with a degree in Print Journalism in 2008 and is a member of the 2009 class of Leadership Long Beach. You can find him on various basketball courts around the city.
Ryan's Archives
Show All Archives |
||||
| About Us | Contact Us | Policies | ||||