Saturday, March 13, 2010 | Home
Federal Breakwater Study Coming, Says Richardson
by Ryan ZumMallen | Long Beach News | 06.26.09 |
| Text Size:
+

Congresswoman Laura Richardson today announced that she has secured $100,000 in funding for the Army Corps of Engineers to conduct a federal study of the Long Beach Breakwater, at a time when engineering firm Moffat & Nichol is preparing to present the results of their study to the City after it was commissioned in the summer of 2007. The purpose of the Moffat & Nichol study was to present results to the Army Corps of Engineers so that they could determine whether altering the breakwater would be feasible. The presentation to City Council is slated for sometime in July, but what meaning that report will have remains to be seen if the Corps intends to conduct their own study anyway.

We'll have more on this story as it develops. Until then, here is the full text of the release from Congresswoman Richardson's office:

Richardson Makes Waves in Long Beach and Washington

~Funding is major accomplishment for Long Beach~

Washington, DC—For several years now, Long Beach residents and government officials have struggled with the issues relating to the breakwater. The wait is over. Congresswoman Laura Richardson announced today that she has secured $100,000 in federal funding to authorize the Army Corps of Engineers to evaluate the Federal interest in a reconfiguration of the Long Beach Breakwater off the coast of Long Beach to improve water quality, promote navigation, preserve coastal zones, and protect property.

Eight miles in length, the Long Beach Breakwater is the longest breakwater in the United States. During World War II, the breakwater protected the ships of the U.S. Pacific Fleet from large waves stationed in Long Beach Harbor. The Long Beach Breakwater was authorized in 1930 in the Federal River and Harbor Act. In 1941 construction began on the 2.5-mile eastern leg of the breakwater, which was completed in 1949. The Army Corps of Engineers maintains jurisdiction over the breakwater’s modification or removal.

Primary benefits of the breakwater are that it prevents large waves from disrupting the operations of the port and possible residences. However, by the existence of the breakwater which the normal flow of the ocean current is disrupted and fails to perform its normal function of keeping beach waters free of pollutants. Additionally, some believe, the current configuration of the breakwater has had a significant adverse impact on the area’s water supply, because urban runoff and storm water discharge from the Los Angeles River gets trapped inside the harbor.

In 2007, the Long Beach City Council commissioned a reconnaissance report of the breakwater. The study was the first official step taken to address the community's questions about the role the Long Beach Breakwater and its impact has on public health, safety and the environment of our community.

The federal funding secured by Congresswoman Richardson will enable the Army Corps of Engineers to conduct a Reconnaissance Study to determine whether there is federal interest in altering the breakwater and undertaking the next step of conducting a cost-sharing feasibility study. If there is a Federal interest in altering the breakwater, the Army Corps of Engineers will then create a Project Management Plan (PMP), which documents the purpose of the feasibility study and the tasks that are needed to complete it. The PMP will also describe the agreement between the Army Corps of Engineers and the City of Long Beach regarding the sharing of costs and the roles and responsibilities of each party.

“After requesting funding last year, conducting several meetings with the Army Corps and intense negotiations with Appropriations Committee leadership, today all of Long Beach once and for all can review the facts of the longest urban breakwater in the country,” Congresswoman Richardson said.

Congresswoman Richardson noted, “This $100,000 allocation for the Army Corps’s reconnaissance report is one of the most vital allocations this region will receive and it is particularly vital in these economic times to ensure an objective evaluation is made so that all resident, business and government issues and concerns are considered.”

Congresswoman Richardson is a Democrat from California’s 37th Congressional District. She is a member of the House Committees on Transportation & Infrastructure and Homeland Security. Her district includes Long Beach, Compton, Carson, Watts, Willowbrooke and Signal Hill.


Comments
Click Here to Leave a Comment

Nikol
I hope they fix this, there has to be something that can be done

Richard Black
It's time to make some waves.

Jim Danno
As Bud Johnson said in his report, Just by lowering the breakwater 12 feet below the surface for 100 yards of the middle section only, will increase the flow of water enough to flush pollutants away from our shoreline. This will also keep the shoreline homes protected. It's a win win. I would love to see waves return to Long Beach.

Bill Orton
I oppose alterations to the three segments of the federal breakwater. Scientists predict a rise in ocean levels of between 3 and 10 feet due to global warming. Rather than contemplate tearing holes in the protective barrier, we should be contemplating how to better safeguard our waterfront, shoreline and waterways from catastrophic flooding either due to ocean rise, tsunami or sea surges. Any study should take into account the risk of catastrophic flooding, as well as the potential negative impact on terminal operations at the ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles. According to published reports, a ocean surge of nine feet would be enough to knock out infrastructure at the ports. Some are giddy about the prospect of wave action on our shore, but I believe the risks of catastrophic flooding are being lost in all the ballyhoo. I urge the Congresswoman to weigh carefully how these precious tax dollars are spent, and give due consideration to the questions of flooding and impact on homes, waterways and the ports.

Charlie
I fully support the security and safety of our shores & harbor the breakwater was engineered to do - the removal of it would be a disaster to harbor operations and shore property owners; I would hope the study would include a system of cleaning and keeping our inner harbor free of debris and bacteria...

Dennis
Bill, you confuse me. With the current breakwater, it is not a "dam" to hold back the ocean. If the ocean level is going to rise 3 to 10 feet, as you state, the breakwater is not going to hold back that water. The peninsula homes will be affected either way. Also, aren't all taxpayers paying enough to protect the Peninsula's homes by building a sand barrier against wave action? If you look at old pictures of the peninsula, you can see the natural sand barrier was much larger than today. You talk about wasting taxes, how about those monies?

lbresident
just so we're clear, I am very conservative. I think we should end all social services. I also live in the "pricey coastal zone" of long beach and have owned my home for 10 years. I fully support reconfiguring the breakwater as do many of my residents. Don't let the colonnas, oneils, etc let you think that there is wide opposition to this on the peninsula, naples, belmont, etc. Many support finally doing something to help our coast because we see both the financial and quality of life benefits. if this happens it would be the first positive think richardson has ever done. Get on board Gary Delong!

Dave Hall
Good. Take down the breakwater. Alter the breakwater to allow more flushing of the harbor waters. Anything to improve the water quality of San Pedro Bay. This will help residents and wildlife of the area. It's about time to get this done.

Andrew
Bill, using global warming as a fear to keep the breakwater...are you serious? Tsunami fears? Sea surges? If that is truly something that frightens you, perhaps you should not live near the ocean. Utilizing history as an indication or future events...can you name the last tsunami to hit Long Beach? Or rise in sea level? Or sea surge? This is purely unjustified fear based worry. I'm a third generation Long Beach native, my grandmother (and my father) recall the days before the breakwater and speak fondly of how Long Beach was - it can become this again if we remove part or all of the unnecessary breakwater. If for no other reason than to remove the pollutants. I live in Bixby Knolls, I took my kids to the beach portion of Long Beach last summer - dog fecies, plastic bags, diapers, deteriorated frisbees, chunks of styrofoam and an overall stench were present. We left, staying only 15 minutes. Yes, people are disgusting for throwing their garbage in our ocean...however, the ocean has this wonderful washing machine capacity if you allow it to do it's job. By building this false breakwater we prevented the natural process of cleansing to occur. And finally, can we vote Richardson out of office. Financially speaking...she's an embarassment.

Joe Weinstein
Dennis and Bill are both right. Yes, Dennis: Permanent sea level rise from global warming will trump anything done or not done with the breakwater. Yes, Bill: Deciding how affordably to respond overall to the sea-level rise is far more crucial than trying to get extra kicks for a few decades from a suitably changed (or not) breakwater. Yes, Laura deserves credit, as do her present and recent Port-boosting Port-barreling politico colleagues on the LB Council and in the House. Credit for promoting ever more global trade, the massive extra greenhouse gas emissions from its vehicle and input industries, and thereby bigger and faster global warming and sea level rise, and thereby surer and faster destruction of LB's beachside neighborhoods. These pols two biggest specific achievements to date are their most recent. *Yesterday's House-passed 'climate' bill pretends to fight global warming, but ensures that big fast climate change will prevail, though a combination of too little, too late, too many loopholes, big giveways to polluters, and scant guarantee of effective enforcement of limits. *The Port's latest and greatest project, Middle Harbor Expansion, recommits the USA's nigh-biggest port to massive increases in trade and its overall massive increases in global emissions. With these commitments FOR global warming, from Congress and the nigh-biggest port, never mind treaties, signed or not. The USA and world now have no credibility for effective action to stop those big sea level rises from coming bigger and faster than predicted even in the most recent official reports.

captain fun
I agree with every aspect of Andrews commentary,including the swipe at Congresswomen Richardson.Really, is this the best we can come up with to represent us?

Don Darnauer
Related to this breakwater story, LBPOST should contact Dr Preston Smith of Long Beach, 562/439-0181 who has some very interesting perspectives on the pros/cons of the breakwater. He gave us, at the Military Officers Assn, a good educational slide presentation. Please get his side of this issue.

Long Beach News
LBPOST.com Managing Editor Ryan ZumMallen keeps up on all the current and breaking Long Beach news.

Ryan ZumMallen is a graduate of the CSULB School of Journalism, writing for the campus' Union Weekly newspaper and serving as Sports Editor for one year. He has written for numerous news and sports websites and magazines, as well as television experience with Fox Sports and ABC Channel 7.

Ryan's Community

Leadership Long Beach
Ryan's Archives

March, 2010

03.12.10 Family Pleads For Justice After Murder Of Long Beach Teen
03.12.10 $1,000 At Stake In Annual Spelling Bee This Weekend
03.11.10 Should Measure T Be Placed On The Ballot Again?
03.11.10 Rally Planned To Promote Peace In Face Of Long Beach Violence
03.11.10 Submerged Woman Rescued After Driving Off Long Beach Bridge
03.10.10 Long Beach Unemployment Back Up To 14.5%
03.10.10 Six Injured, Traffic Slowed In 710 Freeway Accident
03.10.10 Long Beach Passes Medical Marijuana Ordinance
03.10.10 \"Long Beach Reads One Book\" Literacy Event Still Going Strong
03.09.10 Police Chief McDonnell Meets With Long Beach Latino Leaders
03.08.10 Debating Season In Full Swing Tonight
03.08.10 Two Dead In Long Beach \"Pack Rat\" House Fire
03.08.10 Success In A Freakonomy, Part V: Put Your Net to Work
03.05.10 UPDATE: Three Shot In Attempted Bank Robbery In Long Beach
03.05.10 High-Ranking Port Employee Leaving To Start Law Firm
03.05.10 Mayor Bob Foster Appointed By Governor To Electricity Board
03.04.10 Long Beach Teachers & Tom Morello Rally For Public Education
03.04.10 Update: Search For New Long Beach Fire Chief To Include Candidates Across California
03.03.10 Urban Basketball Court Among New Long Beach Park Projects
03.03.10 Long Beach Art Museums To Participate In Getty Exhibit
03.03.10 Citywide Reading Program Led By \"The Soloist\" Today
03.02.10 Teachers Association To Hold Protest At Wilson High
03.02.10 Knabe Offers $5K Reward After Swastika Carved In Golf Course
03.02.10 Atlantic Avenue Organizations Receive $80k In Grant Funding
03.01.10 Wednesday: Debate Between 9th District Council Candidates

February, 2010

02.27.10 UPDATE: Tsunami Advisory Issued For Long Beach
02.27.10 UPDATE: Is The Long Beach City Manager Being Pushed Out?
02.26.10 Elementary Award Draws Eye Of U.S. Education Department
02.26.10 Kogi BBQ Truck Heading To Long Beach Tonight
02.25.10 Malaria Documentary To Debut At Art Theatre Tonight

Show All Archives


About Us | Contact Us | Policies