| Sunday, March 14, 2010 | Home |
|
![]() |
|
Breakwater Plans Have A Long Way To Go by Ryan ZumMallen | Long Beach News | 06.29.09 | | Text Size: +
Recent news that the Army Corps of Engineers will conduct a federal study of the Long Beach breakwater has breathed new life into locals who believe the structure should be altered - or removed completely, some say - but there are plenty of hurdles and hoops standing in the way before we see any actual change. For one, the $100,000 funding that is necessary for the study has not yet passed through Washington. The Press-Telegram's Paul Eakins explains it thusly: The $100,000 funding still must be approved by the full House Appropriations Committee, as well as by a counterpart committee in the Senate, and then approved by both bodies of Congress. For the sake of speculation, though, let's assume the funding passes. The Army Corps would then be able to proceed with their study. Now, if you've been following the plight of the breakwater in recent years, you know not to get too excited about a study. The Long Beach City Council last year spent $100,000 to commission a similar study from local engineering firm Moffatt & Nichol, which is expected to be presented sometime next month. That study took more than nine months and included public information meetings (the first of which we covered in this article), and could be used in partnership with a possible upcoming federal study. But what exactly are they studying? Just as the Corps had to be convinced that the issue is worth examining, they also must be convinced that the issue is worth taking action. Not a single rock will be removed from that breakwater unless the Corps deems it necessary. And that will be the tough part. All kinds of ideas have been flown around when it comes to altering the breakwater, the most famous of which may be the study independently conducted by retired engineer Bud Johnson, which proposes that an 1800-foot gap be created in the structure in order to create ocean flow and current. Click here for our February article about Johnson's study. The purpose of that action is primarily to clean the water by allowing the trash and debris accumulated along Long Beach's shore to flow out to sea through the opening. But that benefit alone will not convince the Corps. The Army Corps of Engineers originally built and now owns the breakwater, so they don't have to change it if they don't want to - no matter what any other report suggests. They'll need proof that there are potential economic benefits, that there will be no environmental harm caused, and that there is no possibility of future property damage. Arguments can certainly be made for all three, but the toughest hurdle will be convincing the Corps that there is no danger of harm to any of the THUMS oil islands, shoreline homes and buildings, or docked shipping tankers waiting to enter the Port of Long Beach. If any of those fears cannot be eased by a study, the whole deal is off. Assuming the Corps does approve of altering the breakwater, though, the City of Long Beach will need to come up with half of the construction costs - a pricetag that has ranged in estimates between $10-$20 million. A press release from Congresswoman Laura Richardson's office on Friday said, "The wait is over," referring to Long Beach's struggles with the breakwater. For supporters of making changes to the breakwater, the announcement that funding for a federal study moving through Washington is surely progress. More accurately, though, the wait is just beginning. Comments
Click Here to Leave a Comment
lbresident we must be persistent. Bill Orton The wait on any major issue is determined by whether all sides can reach consensus on how to proceed. Clearly, there are deep divisions between those who want alterations made to the federal breakwater and others who wish it left unaltered. Added to that divide is the fact that the millions of dollars that would be needed to fund construction simply are not available. The city is examining how to close a $44 million budget deficit. Creating consensus on how to proceed and finding the money to cover the city's share of construction costs will demand a far greater alignment of common will than advocates for alteration have yet produced. Mr. Johnson's hard work is a good example of how individual citizens can constructively move the debate. But browbeating and bullying seem more the order of business for proponents of altering the breakwater. Dave in Alamitos Beach That there WILL be no environmental harm done? What about the substantial current environmental harm being done? I'm surprised no one has sued the Army Corps of Engineers yet for leaving their environmental nightmare behind... lbresident Good point Dave. It really is hard to argue that the corp isn't responsible for enviromental damage. Let's see if they play nicely. If they don't, maybe we will have to sue them. Curious Would altering the Breakwater create more jobs? Pam in Belmont Heights The condition of our filthy beaches shows plenty of environmental harm! I think the economical benefits to Long Beach in taking down the breakwater would be huge. It would totally change our tourist industry if we had a beach that people could actually swim in or jump in to go diving. I hate having to go to Orange County in order to swim in the water! I'd much rather spend my money locally. I hope we don't give up. Go to the website at http://republic.barefootwine.com/beachrescue/ and vote for "Sink the Breakwater - Restore the Shore (Long Beach, CA)" BobS I think I'd rather spend the study money on ways to clean up the Los Angeles River -- the source of most of the trash and pollution. Having the crud wash out to sea somehow seems a poor outcome. I also think you might consider the impact of breaching the breakwater on the Port and on the boating community, as both are substantial parts of the economy of Long Beach. Charlie It just goes to show, Ryan, the responders this time are not using common sense, nor, are they interested in the consequences to the shore property owners or harbor operations by its removal - not to mention security & safety... Aaron I think both sides have a point in this arguement... but I don't see why there isn't an obvious compromise. Why can't we leave the breakwater in front of the port and opening gaps in the portion that is in front of the beach?! It obviously needs some better circulation, that water is disgusting. Even a little bit would be better than nothing. As for the oil islands... yes heaven forbid we don't give in to big oil on this issue. Long Beach is still a sinking city thanks to their brilliance. Studies are definitely important...(just out of curiosity though, did they ever do a study on the effects BEFORE they put the thing in?) but don't forget there are other areas out there that have had this same problem... "The World" in Dubai, for example, had this exact same problem... the breakwaters weren't allowing proper circulation and oxygenation. They figured out a way to fix it... (a couple of holes did the trick) Granted I'm sure conditions are different here but I hope they are at least using their example as a place to start. Douglas Frankenfeld Prior to 2000, when the city received a diminising return of state tidelands oil money that could have been used to reconfigure the breakwater, the city instead had the infinite wisdom to landfill Rainbow Lagoon and the Pike, thus destroying the meaning of "Seaside Way," and had the even bigger wisdom of purchasing an historic, albeit inoperable rusting hulk that crossed the Atlantic Ocean, with the then-mayor exclaiming, "The Queen Mary will be bigger than Disneyland!" Alas, the breakwater, Shoreline Dr, and the Queen Mary remain sitting there, providing a seascape. (For further dialogue, see Higginbotham's latest writing.) lbresident I really do wonder where people get off worrying about the port or oil islands. Obviously these aren't long beach homeowners. Their primary concern should be the current poor quality of their own beach. And as another said, reconfiguration doesn't have to be where the port is anyway. leave that part in tact. Yes there are some peninsula residents that are old/fear the boogey man, etc and can't see the light of day on this issue. But other than them most of long beach knows we need to do this. for the most part only the outside long beach interests oppose compromised approach to reconfiguration. myth #1 - reconfiguration will harm the port and oil islands myth #2 - shore properties will be damaged if we reconfigure the breakwater I have lived in my coastal lb home which i have owned for 10 years and I know that fears of reconfiguration are unjustified as do many of my neighbors. lbresident bobs, let clean up the la river and reconfigure the breakwater. C in the LB Cleaning up the LA river should be a very high priority. Clean up the other channels and rivers too such as Los Cerritos Channel and San Gabriel River. Re-configuring the breakwater should also be a priority. And don't forget we should restore Los Cerritos Wetlands and Colorado Lagoon while we are at it. This is a beach city. It should be a tourist attraction benefiting our local economy. Our LB residents should be spending their $ here to enjoy the coast, not in the OC. And restorations could be done in a way that doesn't harm property or the port. Some of the restorations I just mentioned would protect property and most likely even increase value instead. Polluted oceans...you really want to eat seafood from that? Don't just create a pathway for pollution to escape, cleanup the rivers, the port, restore our coast instead, we all would benefit from this in many ways. LB Sailor The environmental harm was done when the original breakwall was installed. The environment has since adapted. Any modification to the breakwall will cause renewed distress to the environment. Travis BSK The breakwater needs to be taken down. Aside from the disgusting cesspool of a waterfront it has created, the economic damage has been irreversable. Unlike the forlorn stretch of sand we have here in Long Beach, Seal beach and Huntington Beach draw tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands of beach-goers each summer; they pay money for parking, food, souvenirs and are basically responsible for the well being of these beach cities' economies. It is no wonder our city is millions of dollars in debt, our biggest tourist attraction, our "Beach" is repulsive and has a nauseating stench to go with it; nobody wants to come here and we are missing out on an enormous source of income. Heaven forbid the oil islands, which cause their own unique set of problems, and the big tankers carrying all kinds of junk to wall-mart, be put in danger. Looking back at pictures of the old days before the breakwater, one can see a flourishing city full of character, excitement, and most importantly happy beach-goers. Now city planners have tried to revamp this kind of environment with the utter failure which is the steril, waste of space known as the pike, but nothing is going to restore our care free, beach city, atmosphere unless it we have a clean beach with waves, its the only way. It is very sad that we have lived like this for so long. Dave in Alamitos Beach At one of the Alamitos Beach meetings, the designer and/or current steward of the oil islands said there was no possiblity of damage to the islands, even without the breakwater. And clearly the port is built to last. Once again, these are both myths and fear-mongering brought up by people opposed to change for their own reasons. lbresident dave in alamitos beach has it correct. Jenny Stockdale Ryan, Great coverage on the Breakwater--my favorite LB subject! One minor correction though: The Army Corps. is not conducting another study. The $100 K will be used to review the study submitted by Moffatt & Nichol, at least that's my understanding of it from the city's website & Tom Modica's explanation: http://www.longbeach.gov/citymanager/ga/breakwater/default.asp. Keep up the good work.
Long Beach News
LBPOST.com Managing Editor Ryan ZumMallen keeps up on all the current and breaking Long Beach news.
Ryan ZumMallen is a graduate of the CSULB School of Journalism, writing for the campus' Union Weekly newspaper and serving as Sports Editor for one year. He has written for numerous news and sports websites and magazines, as well as television experience with Fox Sports and ABC Channel 7.
Ryan's Archives
March, 2010 03.12.10 Family Pleads For Justice After Murder Of Long Beach Teen 03.12.10 $1,000 At Stake In Annual Spelling Bee This Weekend 03.11.10 Should Measure T Be Placed On The Ballot Again? 03.11.10 Rally Planned To Promote Peace In Face Of Long Beach Violence 03.11.10 Submerged Woman Rescued After Driving Off Long Beach Bridge 03.10.10 Long Beach Unemployment Back Up To 14.5% 03.10.10 Six Injured, Traffic Slowed In 710 Freeway Accident 03.10.10 Long Beach Passes Medical Marijuana Ordinance 03.10.10 \"Long Beach Reads One Book\" Literacy Event Still Going Strong 03.09.10 Police Chief McDonnell Meets With Long Beach Latino Leaders 03.08.10 Debating Season In Full Swing Tonight 03.08.10 Two Dead In Long Beach \"Pack Rat\" House Fire 03.08.10 Success In A Freakonomy, Part V: Put Your Net to Work 03.05.10 UPDATE: Three Shot In Attempted Bank Robbery In Long Beach 03.05.10 High-Ranking Port Employee Leaving To Start Law Firm 03.05.10 Mayor Bob Foster Appointed By Governor To Electricity Board 03.04.10 Long Beach Teachers & Tom Morello Rally For Public Education 03.04.10 Update: Search For New Long Beach Fire Chief To Include Candidates Across California 03.03.10 Urban Basketball Court Among New Long Beach Park Projects 03.03.10 Long Beach Art Museums To Participate In Getty Exhibit 03.03.10 Citywide Reading Program Led By \"The Soloist\" Today 03.02.10 Teachers Association To Hold Protest At Wilson High 03.02.10 Knabe Offers $5K Reward After Swastika Carved In Golf Course 03.02.10 Atlantic Avenue Organizations Receive $80k In Grant Funding 03.01.10 Wednesday: Debate Between 9th District Council CandidatesFebruary, 2010 02.27.10 UPDATE: Tsunami Advisory Issued For Long Beach 02.27.10 UPDATE: Is The Long Beach City Manager Being Pushed Out? 02.26.10 Elementary Award Draws Eye Of U.S. Education Department 02.26.10 Kogi BBQ Truck Heading To Long Beach Tonight 02.25.10 Malaria Documentary To Debut At Art Theatre TonightShow All Archives |
||
| About Us | Contact Us | Policies | ||